Abortion Surveillance — United States, 2022

Stephanie Ramer, MPH1; Antoinette T. Nguyen, MD1; Lisa M. Hollier, MD1; Jessica Rodenhizer, MPH1; Lee Warner, PhD1; Maura K. Whiteman, PhD1 (

On This Page

Tables

Related Materials

• Article PDF

Abstract

**Problem/Condition: **CDC conducts abortion surveillance to document the number and characteristics of women obtaining legal induced abortions and the number of abortion-related deaths in the United States.

**Period Covered: **2022.

**Description of System: **Each year, CDC requests abortion data from the central health agencies for the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and New York City. For 2022, a total of 48 reporting areas voluntarily provided aggregate abortion data to CDC. Of these, 47 reporting areas provided data each year during 2013–2022. Census and natality data were used to calculate abortion rates (number of abortions per 1,000 women aged 15–44 years) and ratios (number of abortions per 1,000 live births), respectively. Abortion-related deaths from 2021 were assessed as part of CDC’s Pregnancy Mortality Surveillance System (PMSS).

**Results: **For 2022, a total of 613,383 abortions were reported to CDC from 48 reporting areas. Among 47 reporting areas with data each year during 2013–2022, in 2022, a total of 609,360 abortions were reported, the abortion rate was 11.2 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15–44 years, and the abortion ratio was 199 abortions per 1,000 live births. From 2021 to 2022, the total number of abortions decreased 2% (from 622,108 total abortions), the abortion rate decreased 3% (from 11.6 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15–44 years), and the abortion ratio decreased 2% (from 204 abortions per 1,000 live births). From 2013 to 2022, the total number of reported abortions decreased 5% (from 640,154), the abortion rate decreased 10% (from 12.4 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15–44 years), and the abortion ratio increased 1% (from 198 abortions per 1,000 live births).

In 2022, women in their 20s accounted for more than half of abortions (56.5%). Women aged 20–24 and 25–29 years accounted for the highest percentages of abortions (28.3% and 28.2%, respectively) and had the highest abortion rates (18.1 and 18.7 abortions per 1,000 women aged 20–24 and 25–29 years, respectively). By contrast, adolescents aged 13 weeks’ gestation remained low (≤8.7%). In 2022, the highest percentage of abortions were performed by early medication abortion at ≤9 weeks’ gestation (53.3%), followed by surgical abortion at ≤13 weeks’ gestation (35.5%), surgical abortion at >13 weeks’ gestation (6.9%), and medication abortion at >9 weeks’ gestation (4.3%); all other methods were uncommon (**Interpretation: **Among the 47 areas that reported data continuously during 2013–2022, overall decreases were observed over this time in the number and rate of reported abortions and an increase was observed in the abortion ratio; in addition, from 2021 to 2022, decreases of 2%–3% were observed across all measures.

**Public Health Action: **Abortion surveillance can be used to help evaluate programs aimed at promoting equitable access to patient-centered quality contraceptive services in the United States to reduce unintended pregnancies.

Introduction

This report summarizes data on legal induced abortions for 2022 that were provided voluntarily to CDC by the central health agencies of 48 reporting areas (46 states, the District of Columbia, and New York City, excluding California, Maryland, New Hampshire, and New Jersey) and comparisons over time for the 47 reporting areas that reported each year during 2013–2022 (46 states and New York City). This report also summarizes abortion-related deaths reported voluntarily to CDC for 2021 as part of the Pregnancy Mortality Surveillance System (PMSS). Since 1969, CDC has conducted abortion surveillance to document the number and characteristics of women obtaining legal induced abortions in the United States. After nationwide legalization of abortion in 1973, the total number, rate (number of abortions per 1,000 women aged 15–44 years), and ratio (number of abortions per 1,000 live births) of reported abortions increased rapidly, reaching the highest levels in the 1980s, before decreasing at a slow yet steady pace (1,2). During 2006–2008, a break occurred in the previously sustained pattern of decrease (3,4), although this break was followed in subsequent years by even greater decreases (5,6). However, from 2018 to 2019, increases of 1%–3% were observed across all measures (7). From 2019 to 2020, decreases were observed in the number and rate of reported abortions; however, a 2% increase was observed in the abortion ratio (8). From 2020 to 2021, increases of 4%–5% were observed across all measures (9). Abortion incidence and practices have varied over the years and continue to vary across subpopulations (10–15), highlighting the utility of continued surveillance.

Description of the Surveillance System

Each year, CDC requests aggregate data from the central health agencies of the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and New York City to document the number and characteristics of women obtaining legal induced abortions in the United States. Not all persons who obtain abortions identify as women; the term “women” has been maintained in this report to be consistent with the collection and reporting of denominator data used to calculate abortion rates and ratios. This report contains data for 2022 voluntarily reported to CDC as of July 15, 2024. For the purpose of surveillance, legal induced abortion is defined as an intervention performed within the limits of state and jurisdiction law by a licensed clinician (e.g., a physician, nurse-midwife, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant) intended to terminate a suspected or known intrauterine pregnancy and that does not result in a live birth. This definition excludes management of intrauterine fetal death, early pregnancy failure or loss, ectopic pregnancy, or retained products of conception. All abortions in this report are considered to be legally induced unless stated otherwise.

In most states and jurisdictions, collection of abortion data is facilitated by a legal requirement for hospitals, facilities, or physicians to report abortions to a central health agency (16); however, reporting is not complete in all areas, including in certain areas with reporting requirements (17). The reporting of abortion data to CDC is voluntary, and many reporting areas have developed their own data collection forms and might not collect or provide all the information requested by CDC. As a result, the level of detail reported to CDC might vary from year to year and by reporting area. To encourage uniform collection of data, the National Association for Public Health Statistics and Information Systems (NAPHSIS), with technical assistance from CDC, developed technical guidance for vital statistics personnel who collect and summarize abortion data within the United States (18).

Variables and Categorization of Data

Each year, CDC sends a suggested template to central health agencies in the United States for compilation of aggregate abortion data among women obtaining legal induced abortions. Aggregate abortion numbers, without individual-level records, are requested for the following variables:

• Age group in years of women obtaining legal induced abortions (In addition, the template provided by CDC requests that aggregate abortion numbers for certain variables be cross-tabulated by a second variable. The cross-tabulations presented in this report include weeks of gestation separately by method type, by age group, and by race and ethnicity.

Beginning with 2014 data, instead of reporting the clinician’s estimates of gestational age or estimates of gestational age that were based on last menstrual period, certain areas have reported “probable postfertilization age,” “clinician’s estimate of gestation based on date of conception,” and “probable gestational age” to CDC. To facilitate consistency between data reported as postfertilization age and the data collection practices for gestational age recommended by CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics (19), 2 weeks were added to probable postfertilization age. This method was used to account for time after last menstrual period until ovulation in a standard 28-day cycle because fertilization occurs around the time of ovulation (20). No modifications were made to data reported as clinician’s estimate of gestational age that was based on date of conception or data reported as probable gestational age.

In this report, medication and surgical abortions are further categorized by gestational age when available in the categories reported to CDC. Early medication abortion is defined as the administration of medications (typically mifepristone followed by misoprostol) to induce an abortion at ≤9 completed weeks’ gestation, consistent with U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) labeling for mifepristone that was implemented in 2016 (21). CDC collects information only on the estimated number of weeks (not days) of gestation and acknowledges the conventional use of completed weeks of gestation to describe pregnancy duration; therefore, CDC’s category of ≤9 weeks’ gestation includes abortions through 9 weeks and 6 days. Medications (typically serial prostaglandins, sometimes administered after mifepristone) also might be used to induce an abortion at >9 weeks’ gestation. Surgical abortions, which include uterine aspiration (i.e., dilation and curettage, aspiration curettage, suction curettage, manual vacuum aspiration, menstrual extraction, or sharp curettage) and dilation and evacuation procedures, are categorized as having been performed at ≤13 weeks’ gestation or at >13 weeks’ gestation because of differences in surgical technique at these gestational ages (22). Finally, because intrauterine instillation is unlikely to be performed early in gestation (23), abortions reported to have been performed by intrauterine instillation at ≤12 weeks’ gestation are excluded from calculation of the percentage of abortions by known method type and are grouped with unknown type.

Measures of Abortion

Four measures of abortion are presented in this report: 1) the number of abortions in a specific population, 2) the percentage of abortions by selected characteristics, 3) the abortion rate (number of abortions per 1,000 women within a specific population), and 4) the abortion ratio (number of abortions per 1,000 live births within a specific population). Abortion rates adjust for differences in population size. Abortion ratios measure the relative number of pregnancies in a specific population that end in abortion compared with live birth.

U.S. Census Bureau estimates of the resident female population were used as the denominator for calculating abortion rates (24–33). Overall abortion rates were calculated from the population of women aged 15–44 years living in the reporting areas that provided continuously reported data. For adolescents aged 34,35). For calculation of the total abortion rates and total abortion ratios only, women with unknown data on selected characteristics (e.g., age, race and ethnicity, and marital status) were distributed according to the distribution of abortions among those with known information on the characteristic. For calculation of totals only, abortions for women with an unknown gestational age of pregnancy but known method type were distributed according to the distribution of abortions among those with known information on method type by gestational age to the following categories: surgical, ≤13 weeks’ gestation; surgical, >13 weeks’ gestation; medication, ≤9 weeks’ gestation; and medication, >9 weeks’ gestation.

Data Presentation and Analysis

This report provides aggregate and reporting area–specific abortion numbers, rates, and ratios for the 48 areas that reported to CDC for 2022, which excluded California, Maryland, New Hampshire, and New Jersey. In addition, this report describes characteristics of women who obtained abortions in 2022. The data in this report are presented by the reporting area in which the abortions were performed.

The completeness and quality of data received vary by year, by variable, and by reporting area; this report only describes the characteristics of women obtaining abortions in reporting areas that met CDC reporting standards (i.e., reported at least 20 abortions overall, provided data categorized in accordance with requested variables, and had The percentage change in abortion measures (number, rate, and ratio of reported abortions) from the most recent past year (2021 to 2022) and during the 10-year period of analysis (2013–2022) were calculated for the 47 areas that reported every year during 2013–2022. The percentage change was also calculated and reported for abortions by age group, weeks of gestation, and early medication abortions (≤9 completed weeks’ gestation) for areas that met reporting standards for these variables every year during 2013–2022. As a result, aggregate measures for 2022 in percentage change analyses might differ from the point estimates reported for 2022. These data describe the percentage changes in abortion measures over time and abortion measures among groups for each characteristic. No statistical testing was performed. Comparisons do not imply statistical significance, and lack of comment regarding the difference between values does not imply that no statistically significant difference exists.

Abortion Mortality

CDC has reported data on abortion-related deaths periodically since information on abortion mortality first was included in the 1972 abortion surveillance report (9,36). An abortion-related death is defined as a death resulting from a direct complication of an abortion (legal or illegal), an indirect complication caused by a chain of events initiated by an abortion, or an aggravation of a pre-existing condition by the physiologic effects of abortion. An abortion is categorized as legal when it is performed by a licensed clinician within the limits of state or jurisdiction law.

Since 1987, CDC has monitored abortion-related deaths through PMSS, which includes data from all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and New York City (37). Sources of data to identify abortion-related deaths have included state or jurisdiction vital records; media reports, including computerized searches of full-text newspaper and other media databases; and individual case reports by public health agencies, including maternal mortality review committees, and any additional data when available. For each death that is possibly related to abortion, CDC requests clinical records and autopsy reports. Two medical epidemiologists independently review these reports to determine the cause of death and whether the death was abortion related. Discrepancies are discussed and resolved by consensus. Each death is categorized by abortion type as legal induced, illegal induced, spontaneous, or unknown type.

This report provides PMSS data on induced abortion–related deaths that occurred in 2021, the most recent year for which PMSS data are available. For 1998–2021, abortion surveillance data reported to CDC cannot be used alone to calculate national case-fatality rates for legal induced abortions (number of legal induced abortion–related deaths per 100,000 reported legal induced abortions in the United States) because nine reporting areas did not report abortion data every year during this period (Alaska, 1998–2000; California, 1998–2021; the District of Columbia, 2016; Louisiana, 2005; Maryland, 2007–2021; New Hampshire, 1998–2021; New Jersey, 2021; Oklahoma, 1998–1999; and West Virginia, 2003–2004). Thus, denominator data for calculation of national legal induced abortion case-fatality rates for 1998–2021 were obtained from a published report by the Guttmacher Institute that includes estimated total numbers of abortions in the United States from a national survey of abortion-providing facilities (38). For 2021, denominator data for 2020 were used, the most recent year for which data from the Guttmacher Institute are available. Because rates determined on the basis of a numerator 39), national case-fatality rates for legal induced abortion were calculated for consecutive 5-year periods during 1973–2012 and then for a consecutive 9-year period during 2013–2021.

Total Abortions Reported to CDC by Occurrence

Among the 48 reporting areas that provided data for 2022, a total of 613,383 abortions were reported (

In 2022, reporting areas of occurrence had wide variation in abortion rates (from 0.1 to 28.8 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15–44 years in Missouri and New Mexico, respectively) and abortion ratios (from one to 543 abortions per 1,000 live births in Missouri and New Mexico, respectively) (

Age Group, Race and Ethnicity, and Marital Status

Among the 48 areas that reported abortion numbers by women’s age for 2022, women in their 20s accounted for more than half of abortions (56.5%) (

For 2022, among the 36 areas that reported by marital status, 12.3% of women who obtained an abortion were married, and 87.7% were unmarried (

Previous Live Births and Previous Induced Abortions

For 2022, among the 41 areas that reported the number of previous live births, 40.6%, 24.1%, 19.5%, 9.4%, and 6.5% of abortions reported were among women who had zero, one, two, three, or four or more previous live births, respectively (

Weeks of Gestation and Method Type

For 2022, among the 41 areas that reported gestational age at the time of abortion, 78.6% of abortions were performed at ≤9 weeks’ gestation, and 92.8% were performed at ≤13 weeks’ gestation (

For 2022, among the 47 areas that reported by method type and included medication abortion on their reporting form, 53.3% of abortions were early medication abortions (a nonsurgical abortion at ≤9 weeks’ gestation), 35.5% were surgical abortions at ≤13 weeks’ gestation, 6.9% were surgical abortions at >13 weeks’ gestation, and 4.3% were medication abortions at >9 weeks’ gestation; other methods, including intrauterine instillation and hysterectomy or hysterotomy, were rare (

Among the 40 areas that reported abortions categorized by weeks of gestation and method type for 2022, surgical abortion accounted for the highest percentage of abortions at >10 weeks’ gestation (

The annual number of deaths related to legal induced abortion has fluctuated from year to year since 1973 (Table 15). During 2013–2021, the national case-fatality rate for legal induced abortion was 0.46 deaths related to legal induced abortions per 100,000 reported legal abortions. This case-fatality rate was lower than the rates for the previous 5-year periods.

Discussion

For 2022, a total of 613,383 abortions were reported to CDC by 48 areas. Among the 47 continuously reporting areas, the abortion rate was 11.2 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15–44 years, and the abortion ratio was 199 abortions per 1,000 live births. From 2021 to 2022, the number of abortions decreased 2%, the abortion rate decreased 3%, and the abortion ratio decreased 2%. Multiple factors influence measures of abortion, including access to health care services and contraception (40–42), the availability of abortion providers and clinics (38,43–47), changes in legal restrictions and regulations (48–56), parental involvement laws (57,58), and economic considerations that influence family planning decisions and contraceptive use (59,60).

Abortion measures differ by age group. Among areas that reported data continuously by age during 2013–2022, women aged 20–29 years accounted for the highest percentages of abortions and had the highest abortion rates, whereas adolescents aged The percentage changes in adolescent abortions described in this report are important for monitoring changes in adolescent pregnancies in the United States. From 2013 to 2022, national birth data indicate that the birth rate for adolescents aged 15–19 years decreased 49% (35), and the findings in this report indicate that the abortion rate for the same age group decreased 34%, suggesting a decrease in adolescent pregnancies.

The factors leading to higher abortion rates among certain racial and ethnic minority groups are complex. Race and ethnicity as described in this report are markers not drivers of differences in abortion rates. In addition to disparities in rates of unintended pregnancies (61), structural factors, including unequal access to quality family planning services (62), economic inequities, and mistrust of the medical system (63), can contribute to observed differences. As in previous years, abortion rates and ratios differed across racial and ethnic groups. In 2022, compared with White women, abortion rates and ratios were 4.3 and 4.0 times higher among Black women and 2.0 and 1.6 times higher among Hispanic women. Similar differences by race and ethnicity have been demonstrated in other U.S.-based studies (2,10–13).

During 2022, approximately four of five abortions occurred early in gestation (≤9 weeks), when the risks for complications are lowest (64–67). During the past 10 years, this percentage increased from 75.0% in 2013 to 78.9% in 2022. Moreover, among areas that reported abortions at ≤13 weeks’ gestation by individual week, the distribution of abortions by gestational age continued to shift toward earlier weeks of gestation, with the percentage of early abortions performed at ≤6 weeks’ gestation increasing from 34.8% in 2013 to 41.6% in 2022. Previous research indicates that the distribution of abortions by gestational age differs by various sociodemographic characteristics (68–70). In this report, the percentage of adolescents aged ≤19 years who obtained abortions at >13 weeks’ gestation was higher than the percentage of women aged ≥20 years. The gestational age when abortions are performed can be influenced by multiple factors, including state or jurisdiction abortion restrictions, accurate estimation of gestational age, income level, age, and presence of pregnancy-related health conditions (48,67,69–74).

Changes in clinical practices have facilitated the trend of obtaining abortions earlier in pregnancy. Research conducted in the United States during the 1970s indicated that surgical abortion procedures performed at ≤6 weeks’ gestation, compared with 7–12 weeks’ gestation, were less likely to result in successful termination of the pregnancy (75). However, subsequent advances in technology (e.g., improved transvaginal ultrasonography and sensitivity of pregnancy tests) have allowed early surgical abortions to be performed with completion rates exceeding 97% (76–79). Likewise, the development of early medication abortion regimens has allowed for abortions to be performed early in gestation, with completion rates for regimens that combine mifepristone and misoprostol reaching 96%–98% (79–83).

Trends for early medication abortions are reported to monitor any changes in clinical practice that might have occurred with the accumulation of evidence on the safety and effectiveness of medication abortion beyond 63 days of gestation (8 completed weeks’ gestation) (84), changes in professional practice guidelines (85,86), and the 2016 FDA extension of the gestational age limit for the use of mifepristone for early medication abortion from 63 days to 70 days (9 completed weeks’ gestation) (87). Among abortions occurring at ≤9 weeks’ gestation in 2022, approximately two thirds (70.2%) were reported as early medication abortions. In 2022, the most common method among abortions reported overall was early medication abortion at ≤9 weeks’ gestation (53.3%). Among continuously reporting areas that reported by method type and included medication abortion on their reporting form, the percentage of all abortions performed by early medication abortion increased 129% from 2013 to 2022 and increased 4% from 2021 to 2022.

Because the annual number of deaths related to legal induced abortion is small and statistically unstable, case-fatality rates were calculated for consecutive 5-year periods during 1973–2012 and then for a consecutive 9-year period during 2013–2021. The national case-fatality rate for legal induced abortion was 0.46 per 100,000 abortions during 2013–2021. Since 1978, all rates for the preceding 5-year periods have been

Limitations

The findings in this report are subject to at least five limitations. First, because reporting to CDC is voluntary and reporting requirements vary by the individual reporting areas (16,17), CDC is unable to report the total number of abortions performed in the United States. Of the 52 areas from which CDC requested data for 2022, California, Maryland, New Hampshire, and New Jersey did not submit abortion data. In 2020, the most recent year for which data are available through the Guttmacher Institute’s national survey of abortion-providing facilities, abortions performed in these states accounted for approximately 20% of all abortions in the United States (38). CDC receives aggregated data from the central health agencies of reporting areas, which might result in different estimates than reported by the Guttmacher Institute. Completeness of reporting might vary by reporting area. Whereas most reporting areas have a legal requirement to submit a report for every abortion performed (16), adherence to this requirement might vary (17). Access to telehealth services for abortion varies by state or jurisdiction (47) and reporting of abortions that occur using telehealth services also might vary by reporting area.

Second, many states and jurisdictions use abortion reporting forms that differ from the technical guidance that NAPHSIS developed with technical assistance from CDC. Consequently, certain reporting areas do not collect all variables requested by CDC (e.g., race and ethnicity), do not collect or report all variables for out-of-area residents (e.g., Nevada), or do not report the data in a manner consistent with this guidance (e.g., gestational age). Missing demographic information can reduce the extent to which the statistics in this report represent women who have had abortions. Only 32 reporting areas reported race and ethnicity data to CDC that met CDC’s reporting standards. Certain areas that either do not report to CDC (e.g., California) or do not report race and ethnicity data (e.g., Illinois) have sufficiently large populations of racial and ethnic minority groups that the absence of data from these areas reduces the representativeness of CDC data for these variables. In addition, because of the variability in data collection for race and ethnicity among reporting areas, data for specific racial and ethnic groups beyond Black, White, and Hispanic are not requested or reported. In addition, certain areas collect gestational age data that are based on estimated date of conception or probable postfertilization age, which are not consistent with medical conventions for gestational age reporting. Without medical guidance on how to report these data, the validity and reliability of gestational age for these reporting areas is uncertain.

Third, abortion data are compiled and reported to CDC by the central health agency of the reporting area in which the abortion was performed rather than the reporting area in which the person lived. Thus, the available population (24–33) and birth data (34,35), which are organized by the states or jurisdictions in which women live, might differ from the population of women who undergo abortions in a specific reporting area. This likely results in an overestimation of abortion measures for reporting areas in which a higher percentage of abortions are obtained by out-of-area residents and an underestimation of abortions for reporting areas where residents more frequently obtain abortions out of area. Limited abortion services, stringent regulatory requirements for obtaining an abortion, or geographic proximity to services in another state or jurisdiction might influence where women obtain abortion services (88,89). Studies have demonstrated an increase in out-of-area abortions for residents of states with legal restrictions for abortion (53,90).

Fourth, in this report, the presentations of percentage change for abortions by variables (e.g., weeks of gestation) are limited to the aggregate of the 47 jurisdictions that met reporting standards for every year during 2013–2022. This approach allows for assessment of changes in continuously reporting areas; however, specific jurisdictions’ patterns might differ from aggregate 10-year or year-to-year comparisons.

Finally, CDC reporting of sociodemographic characteristics of women obtaining abortions is limited to data collected on state or jurisdiction reporting forms. Therefore, the examination of additional demographic variables (e.g., income and education) is not possible.

Public Health Implications

Ongoing surveillance of legal induced abortion is important for three reasons. First, abortion surveillance can be used to help evaluate programs aimed at promoting equitable access to patient-centered contraceptive care in the United States to reduce unintended pregnancies. Up to 42% of pregnancies in the United States are unintended (61), and use of effective contraception is a strategy to reduce unintended pregnancy (91). Efforts to improve contraceptive access that consider patient perspectives and remove barriers (e.g., cost) have been associated with declines in the rate of abortion (40–42). Providing contraception at low or no cost can increase contraceptive access and use (92–94). Improvements in provider reimbursement and training, patient-centered counseling, youth-friendly services, and client awareness of available contraceptive methods also might help to improve contraceptive access (95–97), ensure equitable access to patient-centered contraceptive care, and promote equitable reproductive health in the United States (98). Second, routine abortion surveillance can be used to assess changes in clinical practice patterns over time. Information in this report on the number of abortions performed through different methods (e.g., medication or surgical) and at different gestational ages provides the denominator data that are necessary for analyses of the relative safety of abortion practices (99). Finally, information on the number of pregnancies ending in abortion is used in conjunction with data on births and fetal losses to estimate the number of pregnancies in the United States and determine rates for various outcomes of public health importance (61).

Corresponding author: Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC. E-mail: cdcinfo@cdc.gov.

1Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC

Conflicts of Interest

All authors have completed and submitted the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

References

• Gamble SB, Strauss LT, Parker WY, Cook DA, Zane SB, Hamdan S; CDC. Abortion surveillance—United States, 2005. MMWR Surveill Summ 2008;57(No. SS-13):1–32. PMID:19037196
• Jones RK, Kost K, Singh S, Henshaw SK, Finer LB. Trends in abortion in the United States. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2009;52:119–29. https://doi.org/10.1097/GRF.0b013e3181a2af8f PMID:19407518
• Pazol K, Zane SB, Parker WY, Hall LR, Berg C, Cook DA. CDC. Abortion surveillance—United States, 2008. MMWR Surveill Summ 2011;60(No. SS-15):1–41. PMID:22108620
• Jones RK, Kooistra K. Abortion incidence and access to services in the United States, 2008. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2011;43:41–50. https://doi.org/10.1363/4304111 PMID:21388504
• Kortsmit K, Jatlaoui TC, Mandel MG, et al. Abortion surveillance—United States, 2018. MMWR Surveill Summ 2020;69(No. SS-7):1–29. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.ss6907a1 PMID:33237897
• Jones RK, Witwer E, Jerman J. Abortion incidence and service availability in the United States, 2017. New York, NY: Guttmacher Institute; 2019. https://www.guttmacher.org/report/abortion-incidence-service-availability-us-2017
• Kortsmit K, Mandel MG, Reeves JA, et al. Abortion surveillance—United States, 2019. MMWR Surveill Summ 2021;70(No. SS-9):1–29. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.ss7009a1 PMID:34818321
• Kortsmit K, Nguyen AT, Mandel MG, et al. Abortion surveillance—United States, 2020. MMWR Surveill Summ 2022;71(No. SS-10):1–27. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.ss7110a1 PMID:36417304
• Kortsmit K, Nguyen AT, Mandel MG, et al. Abortion surveillance—United States, 2021. MMWR Surveill Summ 2023;72(No. SS-9):1–29. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.ss7209a1 PMID:37992038
• Henshaw SK, Silverman J. The characteristics and prior contraceptive use of U.S. abortion patients. Fam Plann Perspect 1988;20:158–68. https://doi.org/10.2307/2135791 PMID:3243346
• Jones RK, Darroch JE, Henshaw SK. Patterns in the socioeconomic characteristics of women obtaining abortions in 2000–2001. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2002;34:226–35. https://doi.org/10.2307/3097821 PMID:12392215
• Jones RK, Kavanaugh ML. Changes in abortion rates between 2000 and 2008 and lifetime incidence of abortion. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:1358–66. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821c405e PMID:21606746
• Jones RK, Jerman J. Population group abortion rates and lifetime incidence of abortion: United States, 2008–2014. Am J Public Health 2017;107:1904–9. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2017.304042 PMID:29048970
• Maddow-Zimet I, Kost K. Pregnancies, births and abortions in the United States, 1973–2017: national and state trends by age. New York, NY: Guttmacher Institute; 2021. https://www.guttmacher.org/report/pregnancies-births-abortions-in-united-states-1973-2017
• Jones RK, Chiu DW. Characteristics of abortion patients in protected and restricted states accessing clinic-based care 12 months prior to the elimination of the federal constitutional right to abortion in the United States. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2023;55:80–5. https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12224 PMID:37038835
• Guttmacher Institute. Abortion reporting requirements. New York, NY: Guttmacher Institute; 2023. https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/abortion-reporting-requirements
• Saul R. Abortion reporting in the United States: an examination of the federal-state partnership. Fam Plann Perspect 1998;30:244–7. https://doi.org/10.2307/2991612 PMID:9782049
• National Association for Public Health Statistics and Information Systems. Technical resources for reporting induced termination of pregnancy. Silver Spring, MD: National Association for Public Health Statistics and Information Systems; 2019. https://www.naphsis.org/impact/projects/technical-resources-for-reporting-induced-termination-of-pregnancy
• National Center for Health Statistics. Guide to completing the facility worksheets for the certificate of live birth and report of fetal death. Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, National Center for Health Statistics; 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/GuidetoCompleteFacilityWks.pdf
• Fritz MA, Speroff L. Clinical gynecologic endocrinology and infertility. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2012.
• Mifeprex (mifepristone) [Package insert]. New York, NY: Danco Laboratories; 2016.
• Paul M, Lichtenberg ES, Borgatta L, Grimes DA, Stubblefield PG, Creinin MD. Management of unintended and abnormal pregnancy: comprehensive abortion care. Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.; 2009.
• Lichtman AS, Brenner P, Mishell DR Jr. Intrauterine administration of prostaglandin F2alpha as an outpatient procedure for termination of early pregnancy. Contraception 1974;9:403–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-7824(74)90083-3 PMID:4442283
• CDC. Postcensal estimates of the resident population of the United States as of July 1, 2013, by year, state and county, age, bridged race, sex, and Hispanic origin (Vintage 2013). File pcen_v2013_y13.sas7bdat]. Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, National Center for Health Statistics; 2014. [https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/bridged_race/data_documentation.htm#vintage2013
• CDC. Postcensal estimates of the resident population of the United States as of July 1, 2014, by year, state and county, age, bridged race, sex, and Hispanic origin (Vintage 2014). File pcen_v2014_y14.sas7bdat]. Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, National Center for Health Statistics; 2015. [https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/bridged_race/data_documentation.htm#Vintage2014
• CDC. Postcensal estimates of the resident population of the United States as of July 1, 2015, by year, state and county, age, bridged race, sex, and Hispanic origin (Vintage 2015). File pcen_v2015_y15.sas7bdat]. Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, National Center for Health Statistics; 2016. [https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/bridged_race/data_documentation.htm#Vintage2015
• CDC. Postcensal estimates of the resident population of the United States as of July 1, 2016, by year, state and county, age, bridged race, sex, and Hispanic origin (Vintage 2016). File pcen_v2016_y16.sas7bdat]. Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, National Center for Health Statistics; 2017. [https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/bridged_race/data_documentation.htm#Vintage2016
• CDC. Postcensal estimates of the resident population of the United States as of July 1, 2017, by year, state and county, age, bridged race, sex, and Hispanic origin (Vintage 2017). File pcen_v2017_y17.sas7bdat]. Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, National Center for Health Statistics; 2018. [https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/bridged_race/data_documentation.htm#Vintage2017
• CDC. Postcensal estimates of the resident population of the United States as of July 1, 2018, by year, state and county, age, bridged race, sex, and Hispanic origin (Vintage 2018). File pcen_v2018_y18.sas7bdat]. Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, National Center for Health Statistics; 2019. [https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/bridged_race/data_documentation.htm#Vintage2018
• CDC. Postcensal estimates of the resident population of the United States as of July 1, 2019, by year, state and county, age, bridged race, sex, and Hispanic origin (Vintage 2019). File pcen_v2019_y19.sas7bdat]. Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, National Center for Health Statistics; 2020. [https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/bridged_race/data_documentation.htm#Vintage2019
• CDC. Postcensal estimates of the resident population of the United States as of July 1, 2020, by year, state and county, age, bridged race, sex, and Hispanic origin (Vintage 2020). File pcen_v2020_y20.sas7bdat]. Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, National Center for Health Statistics; 2021. [https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/bridged_race/data_documentation.htm#Vintage2020
• Single-race population estimates 2020–2021 by state and single-year age request Internet]. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2022. [https://wonder.cdc.gov/Single-Race-single-year-v2021.HTML
• Single-race population estimates 2020–2022 by state and single-year age request Internet]. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2023. [https://wonder.cdc.gov/Single-Race-single-year-v2022.HTML
• Natality information: live births. Internet]. Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, National Center for Health Statistics. [https://wonder.cdc.gov/Natality.html
• Osterman MJK, Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Driscoll AK, Valenzuela CP. Births: final data for 2022. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2024;73:1–56. PMID:38625869
• CDC. Abortion surveillance, 1972. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, CDC; 1974.
• CDC. Pregnancy Mortality Surveillance System. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC. https://www.cdc.gov/maternal-mortality/php/pregnancy-mortality-surveillance/index.html
• Jones RK, Kirstein M, Philbin J. Abortion incidence and service availability in the United States, 2020. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2022;54:128–41. https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12215 PMID:36404279
• Hoyert DL. Maternal mortality and related concepts. Vital Health Stat 3 2007;33:1–13. PMID:17460868
• Peipert JF, Madden T, Allsworth JE, Secura GM. Preventing unintended pregnancies by providing no-cost contraception. Obstet Gynecol 2012;120:1291–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e318273eb56 PMID:23168752
• Biggs MA, Rocca CH, Brindis CD, Hirsch H, Grossman D. Did increasing use of highly effective contraception contribute to declining abortions in Iowa? Contraception 2015;91:167–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2014.10.009 PMID:25465890
• Ricketts S, Klingler G, Schwalberg R. Game change in Colorado: widespread use of long-acting reversible contraceptives and rapid decline in births among young, low-income women. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2014;46:125–32. https://doi.org/10.1363/46e1714 PMID:24961366
• Upadhyay UD, Weitz TA, Jones RK, Barar RE, Foster DG. Denial of abortion because of provider gestational age limits in the United States. Am J Public Health 2014;104:1687–94. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301378 PMID:23948000
• Grossman D, White K, Hopkins K, Potter JE. Change in distance to nearest facility and abortion in Texas, 2012 to 2014. JAMA 2017;317:437–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.17026 PMID:28114666
• Rader B, Upadhyay UD, Sehgal NKR, Reis BY, Brownstein JS, Hswen Y. Estimated travel time and spatial access to abortion facilities in the US before and after the Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health decision. JAMA 2022;328:2041–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.20424 PMID:36318194
• Jones R, Gibson C, Philbin J. The number of brick-and-mortar abortion clinics drops, as US abortion rate rises: new data underscore the need for policies that support providers. New York, NY: Guttmacher Institute; 2024. https://www.guttmacher.org/report/abortion-clinics-united-states-2020-2024
• Koenig LR, Ko J, Upadhyay UD. Virtual clinic telehealth abortion services in the United States one year after Dobbs: landscape review. J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e50749. https://doi.org/10.2196/50749 PMID:39102679
• Joyce TJ, Henshaw SK, Dennis A, Finer LB, Blanchard K. The impact of state mandatory counseling and waiting period laws on abortion: a literature review. New York, NY: Guttmacher Institute; 2009. https://www.guttmacher.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/pubs/MandatoryCounseling.pdf
• Sanders JN, Conway H, Jacobson J, Torres L, Turok DK. The longest wait: examining the impact of Utah’s 72-hour waiting period for abortion. Womens Health Issues 2016;26:483–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2016.06.004 PMID:27502901
• Ely G, Polmanteer RSR, Caron A. Access to abortion services in Tennessee: does distance traveled and geographic location influence return for a second appointment as required by the mandatory waiting period policy? Health Soc Work 2019;44:13–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/hsw/hly039 PMID:30561624
• de Londras F, Cleeve A, Rodriguez MI, Farrell A, Furgalska M, Lavelanet A. The impact of mandatory waiting periods on abortion-related outcomes: a synthesis of legal and health evidence. BMC Public Health 2022;22:1232. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13620-z PMID:35725439
• KFF. Abortion in the United States dashboard. San Francisco, CA: KFF; 2024. https://www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/dashboard/abortion-in-the-u-s-dashboard/
• White K, Sierra G, Lerma K, et al. Association of Texas’ 2021 ban on abortion in early pregnancy with the number of facility-based abortions in Texas and surrounding states. JAMA 2022;328:2048–55. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.20423 PMID:36318197
• Smith MH, McGowan ML, Kerestes C, Bessett D, Norris AH. Longitudinal impact of Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization on abortion service delivery in Ohio, 2022–2023. Am J Public Health 2024;114:1034–42. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307775 PMID:39231404
• Riley T, Fiastro AE, Benson LS, Khattar A, Prager S, Godfrey EM. Abortion provision and delays to care in a clinic network in Washington State after Dobbs. JAMA Netw Open 2024;7:e2413847. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.13847 PMID:38809551
• Mandelbaum AD, Nacev EC, Fuerst MF, Colwill A, Ramanadhan S, Rodriguez M. Impact of the Dobbs decision on abortion services from a large tertiary center in Oregon. Contraception 2024;136:110484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110484 PMID:38734231
• Dennis A, Henshaw SK, Joyce TJ, Finer LB, Blanchard K. The impact of laws requiring parental involvement for abortion: a literature review. New York, NY: Guttmacher Institute; 2009. https://www.guttmacher.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/pubs/ParentalInvolvementLaws.pdf
• Kramer A, Ti A, Travis L, Laboe A, Ochieng WO, Young MR. The impact of parental involvement laws on minors seeking abortion services: a systematic review. Health Aff Sch 2023;1:qxad045. https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxad045 PMID:38756747
• Guttmacher Institute. A real-time look at the impact of the recession on women’s family planning and pregnancy decisions. New York, NY: Guttmacher Institute; 2009. https://www.guttmacher.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/pubs/RecessionFP.pdf
• Lindberg L, VandeVusse A, Mueller J, Kirstein M. Early impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from the 2020 Guttmacher Survey of Reproductive Health Experiences. New York, NY: Guttmacher Institute; 2020. https://www.guttmacher.org/report/early-impacts-covid-19-pandemic-findings-2020-guttmacher-survey-reproductive-health
• Rossen LM, Hamilton BE, Abma JC, et al. Updated methodology to estimate overall and unintended pregnancy rates in the United States. Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, National Center for Health Statistics; 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_02/sr02-201.pdf
• Dehlendorf C, Rodriguez MI, Levy K, Borrero S, Steinauer J. Disparities in family planning. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202:214–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2009.08.022 PMID:20207237
• Dehlendorf C, Harris LH, Weitz TA. Disparities in abortion rates: a public health approach. Am J Public Health 2013;103:1772–9. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301339 PMID:23948010
• Buehler JW, Schulz KF, Grimes DA, Hogue CJ. The risk of serious complications from induced abortion: do personal characteristics make a difference? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;153:14–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(85)90582-4 PMID:4036997
• Ferris LE, McMain-Klein M, Colodny N, Fellows GF, Lamont J. Factors associated with immediate abortion complications. CMAJ 1996;154:1677–85. PMID:8646655
• Bartlett LA, Berg CJ, Shulman HB, et al. Risk factors for legal induced abortion-related mortality in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:729–37. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000116260.81570.60 PMID:15051566
• Lichtenberg ES, Paul M; Society of Family Planning. Surgical abortion prior to 7 weeks of gestation. Contraception 2013;88:7–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2013.02.008 PMID:23574709
• Foster DG, Kimport K. Who seeks abortions at or after 20 weeks? Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2013;45:210–8. https://doi.org/10.1363/4521013 PMID:24188634
• Jones RK, Finer LB. Who has second-trimester abortions in the United States? Contraception 2012;85:544–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2011.10.012 PMID:22176796
• Kiley JW, Yee LM, Niemi CM, Feinglass JM, Simon MA. Delays in request for pregnancy termination: comparison of patients in the first and second trimesters. Contraception 2010;81:446–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2009.12.021 PMID:20399953
• Drey EA, Foster DG, Jackson RA, Lee SJ, Cardenas LH, Darney PD. Risk factors associated with presenting for abortion in the second trimester. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:128–35. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000189095.32382.d0 PMID:16394050
• Finer LB, Frohwirth LF, Dauphinee LA, Singh S, Moore AM. Timing of steps and reasons for delays in obtaining abortions in the United States. Contraception 2006;74:334–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2006.04.010 PMID:16982236
• Goyal V, Wallace R, Dermish AI, et al. Factors associated with abortion at 12 or more weeks gestation after implementation of a restrictive Texas law. Contraception 2020;102:314–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2020.06.007 PMID:32592799
• Janiak E, Kawachi I, Goldberg A, Gottlieb B. Abortion barriers and perceptions of gestational age among women seeking abortion care in the latter half of the second trimester. Contraception 2014;89:322–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2013.11.009 PMID:24332434
• Kaunitz AM, Rovira EZ, Grimes DA, Schulz KF. Abortions that fail. Obstet Gynecol 1985;66:533–7. PMID:4047543
• Creinin MD, Edwards J. Early abortion: surgical and medical options. Curr Probl Obstet Gynecol Fertil 1997;20:1–32.
• Edwards J, Carson SA. New technologies permit safe abortion at less than six weeks’ gestation and provide timely detection of ectopic gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;176:1101–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70410-1 PMID:9166176
• Paul ME, Mitchell CM, Rogers AJ, Fox MC, Lackie EG. Early surgical abortion: efficacy and safety. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:407–11. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2002.123898 PMID:12193934
• Baldwin MK, Bednarek PH, Russo J. Safety and effectiveness of medication and aspiration abortion before or during the sixth week of pregnancy: a retrospective multicenter study. Contraception 2020;102:13–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2020.04.004 PMID:32298713
• Kapp N, Baldwin MK, Rodriguez MI. Efficacy of medical abortion prior to 6 gestational weeks: a systematic review. Contraception 2018;97:90–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2017.09.006 PMID:28935220
• Kapp N, Eckersberger E, Lavelanet A, Rodriguez MI. Medical abortion in the late first trimester: a systematic review. Contraception 2019;99:77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2018.11.002 PMID:30444970
• Nippita S, Paul M. Abortion. In: Cason P, Cwiak C, Edelman A, Kowal D, Marrazzo J, Nelson A, et al., eds. Contraceptive technology. 22nd ed. Burlington, MA: Jones-Bartlett Learning; 2023:719–64.
• Zhang J, Zhou K, Shan D, Luo X. Medical methods for first trimester abortion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022;5:CD002855. https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD002855.pub5/full PMID:35608608
• Winikoff B, Dzuba IG, Chong E, et al. Extending outpatient medical abortion services through 70 days of gestational age. Obstet Gynecol 2012;120:1070–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31826c315f PMID:23090524
• National Abortion Federation. 2013 clinical policy guidelines. Washington, DC: National Abortion Federation; 2013. https://www.prochoice.org/pubs_research/publications/documents/2013NAFCPGsforweb.pdf
• Creinin M, Grossman DA. Medical management of first-trimester abortion. Contraception 2014;89:148–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2014.01.016 PMID:24795934
• Food and Drug Administration. Information about mifepristone for medical termination of pregnancy through ten weeks gestation. Silver Spring, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration; 2021. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/postmarket-drug-safety-information-patients-and-providers/information-about-mifepristone-medical-termination-pregnancy-through-ten-weeks-gestation
• Jerman J, Frohwirth L, Kavanaugh ML, Blades N. Barriers to abortion care and their consequences for patients traveling for services: qualitative findings from two states. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2017;49:95–102. https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12024 PMID:28394463
• Smith MH, Muzyczka Z, Chakraborty P, et al. Abortion travel within the United States: an observational study of cross-state movement to obtain abortion care in 2017. Lancet Reg Health Am 2022;10:100214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lana.2022.100214 PMID:36777689
• Odouard IC, Guadamuz JS, Chakraborty A, Alexander GC, Qato DM. Induced abortion and out-of-state travel among insured women before and after the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision. O&G Open 2024;1(2):016. https://doi.org/10.1097/og9.0000000000000016
• Trussell J, Wynn LL. Reducing unintended pregnancy in the United States. Contraception 2008;77:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2007.09.001 PMID:18082659
• Goyal V, Canfield C, Aiken ARA, Dermish A, Potter JE. Postabortion contraceptive use and continuation when long-acting reversible contraception is free. Obstet Gynecol 2017;129:655–62. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001926 PMID:28277358
• Secura GM, Allsworth JE, Madden T, Mullersman JL, Peipert JF. The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203:115.e1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.04.017 PMID:20541171
• Biggs MA, Taylor D, Upadhyay UD. Role of insurance coverage in contraceptive use after abortion. Obstet Gynecol 2017;130:1338–46. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002361 PMID:29112661
• Zapata LB, Pazol K, Dehlendorf C, et al. Contraceptive counseling in clinical settings: an updated systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2018;55:677–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2018.07.006 PMID:30342631
• Kumar N, Brown JD. Access barriers to long-acting reversible contraceptives for adolescents. J Adolesc Health 2016;59:248–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.03.039 PMID:27247239
• Parks C, Peipert JF. Eliminating health disparities in unintended pregnancy with long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016;214:681–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.02.017 PMID:26875950
• Holt K, Reed R, Crear-Perry J, Scott C, Wulf S, Dehlendorf C. Beyond same-day long-acting reversible contraceptive access: a person-centered framework for advancing high-quality, equitable contraceptive care. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020;222:S878.e1–.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.11.1279 PMID:31809706
• Zane S, Creanga AA, Berg CJ, et al. Abortion-related mortality in the United States: 1998–2010. Obstet Gynecol 2015;126:258–65. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000945 PMID:26241413

† Number of abortions per 1,000 live births.
§ For each specific year, excludes reporting areas that did not report that year’s abortion numbers to CDC: California (2013–2022), District of Columbia (2016), Maryland (2013–2022), New Hampshire (2013–2022), and New Jersey (2021–2022).
¶ For all years, excludes reporting areas that did not report abortion numbers every year during the analysis period: California, District of Columbia, Maryland, New Hampshire, and New Jersey.

###

• Number of abortions per 1,000 women aged 15–44 years.

† Number of abortions per 1,000 live births.

§ Data are for 47 reporting areas; excludes California, District of Columbia, Maryland, New Hampshire, and New Jersey.

• Number of abortions per 1,000 women aged 15–44 years.
  † Number of abortions per 1,000 live births.
  § Additional details on the reporting area in which abortions were provided, cross-tabulated by the area of residence, are available at https://www.cdc.gov/reproductive-health/data-statistics/abortion-surveillance-findings-reports.html.
  ¶ Data from 48 reporting areas; excludes four reporting areas (California, Maryland, New Hampshire, and New Jersey) that did not report.
  ** The total abortions include those with known and unknown residence status.
  †† Residents of New York State who had abortions in New York City and residents of New York City who had abortions in New York State were excluded from the number and percentage of abortions obtained by out-of-area residents in New York.
  §§ Data reported from facilities physically situated in state only.

• Data from 48 reporting areas; excludes four reporting areas (California, Maryland, New Hampshire, and New Jersey) that did not report, did not report by age, or did not meet reporting standards.
  † Percentages for the individual component categories might not add to 100% because of rounding.
  § Percentage is calculated as the number of abortions reported by known age divided by the sum of abortions reported by known and unknown age. Values ≥99.95% are rounded to 100.0%.
  ¶ Cells with a numerical value in the range of 1–4 and cells that would allow for calculation of these small values have been suppressed.
  ** Includes residents only.
  †† For August–December 2022, variable was collected for residents only and reported as unknown for nonresidents.
  §§ Data reported from facilities physically situated in state only.
  ¶¶ Percentage is based on a total of 613,383 abortions reported among the areas that met reporting standards for age; reporting standards for age were applied to abortions for residents of Illinois only.
  *** Number of abortions obtained by women in a specific age group per 1,000 women in that same age group. Adolescents aged 13–14 years were used as the denominator for the group of adolescents aged ††† Number of abortions obtained by women in a specific age group per 1,000 live births to women in that same age group. For the total abortion ratio only, abortions for women of unknown age were distributed according to the distribution of abortions among women of known age.

• Number of abortions obtained by women in a specific age group per 1,000 women in that same age group. Adolescents aged 13–14 years were used as the denominator for the group of adolescents aged † Number of abortions obtained by women in a specific age group per 1,000 live births to women in that same age group. Abortions for women of unknown age were distributed according to the distribution of abortions among women of known age.
  § Data from 43 reporting areas; excludes nine reporting areas (California, District of Columbia, Florida, Maine, Maryland, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Tennessee, and Wyoming) that did not report, did not report by age, or did not meet reporting standards for ≥1 year.
  ¶ By year, the total number of abortions represent 99.5%–99.7% of all abortions reported to CDC among the areas that met reporting standards for age during 2013–2022; reporting standards for age were applied to abortions for residents of Illinois only during 2013–2019 and 2021–2022.

• Data from 45 reporting areas; excludes seven reporting areas (California, Connecticut, Illinois, Maryland, New Hampshire, New Jersey, and Wisconsin) that did not report, did not report age among adolescents by individual year, or did not meet reporting standards.
  † Percentages for the individual component categories might not add to 100% because of rounding.
  § Cells with a numerical value in the range of 1–4 and cells that would allow for calculation of these small values have been suppressed.
  ¶ For August–December 2022, variable was collected for residents only and reported as unknown for nonresidents.
  ** Data reported from facilities physically situated in state only.
  †† Number of abortions obtained by women in a specific age group per 1,000 women in that same age group. Adolescents aged 13–14 years were used as the denominator for the group of adolescents aged §§ Number of abortions obtained by women in a specific age group per 1,000 live births to women in that same age group. For the total abortion ratio only, abortions for women of unknown age were distributed according to the distribution of abortions among women of known age.

† Including Alaska Native, American Indian, Asian (Indian, Chinese, Filipino, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, or other Asian), Pacific Islander (Native Hawaiian, Guamanian or Chamorro, Samoan, or other Pacific Islander), other races, and multiple races.
§ Percentages for the individual component categories might not add to 100% because of rounding.
¶ Percentage is calculated as the number of abortions reported by known race and ethnicity divided by the sum of abortions reported by known and unknown race and ethnicity. Values ≥99.95% are rounded to 100.0%.
** Cells with a numerical value in the range of 1–4 and cells that would allow for calculation of these small values have been suppressed.
†† For August–December 2022, variable was collected for residents only and reported as unknown for nonresidents.
§§ Reporting form contains only one question for race and ethnicity; therefore, abortions reported for women of Black, White, and other races (Asian and Native American) are not explicitly identified as non-Hispanic.
¶¶ Data reported from facilities physically situated in state only.
*** Percentage is based on a total of 361,987 abortions reported among the areas that met reporting standards for race and ethnicity.
††† Number of abortions obtained by women in a specific racial and ethnic group per 1,000 women aged 15–44 years in that same racial and ethnic group. For the total abortion rate only, abortions for women of unknown race and ethnicity were distributed according to the distribution of abortions among women of known race and ethnicity.
§§§ Number of abortions obtained by women in a specific racial and ethnic group per 1,000 live births to women in that same racial and ethnic group. For the total abortion ratio only, abortions for women of unknown race and ethnicity were distributed according to the distribution of abortions among women of known race and ethnicity.

• Data from 36 reporting areas; excludes 16 reporting areas (Alaska, California, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York City, New York State, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Washington, and Wyoming) that did not report, did not report by marital status, or did not meet reporting standards.
  † Percentages for the individual component categories might not add to 100% because of rounding.
  § Percentage is calculated as the number of abortions reported by known marital status divided by the sum of abortions reported by known and unknown marital status. Values ≥99.95% are rounded to 100.0%.
  ¶ Includes residents only.
  ** For August–December 2022, variable was collected for residents only and reported as unknown for nonresidents.
  †† Recorded as patient married or not married to father.
  §§ Data reported from facilities physically situated in state only.
  ¶¶ Percentage is based on a total of 428,577 abortions reported among the areas that met reporting standards for marital status; reporting standards for marital status were applied to abortions for residents of Illinois only.
  *** Number of abortions obtained by marital status per 1,000 live births to women of the same marital status. For the total abortion ratio only, abortions for women of unknown marital status were distributed according to the distribution of abortions among women of known marital status.

† Percentages for the individual component categories might not add to 100% because of rounding.
§ Percentage is calculated as the number of abortions reported by known number of previous live births divided by the sum of abortions reported by known and unknown number of previous live births. Values ≥99.95% are rounded to 100.0%.
¶ Recorded as the number of previous pregnancies carried to term.
** For August–December 2022, variable was collected for residents only and reported as unknown for nonresidents.
†† Recorded as the number of living children.
§§ Data reported from facilities physically situated in state only.
¶¶ Percentage is based on a total of 463,579 abortions reported among the areas that met reporting standards for the number of previous live births.

† Percentages for the individual component categories might not add to 100% because of rounding.
§ Percentage is calculated as the number of abortions reported by known number of previous induced abortions divided by the sum of abortions reported by known and unknown number of previous induced abortions. Values ≥99.95% are rounded to 100.0%.
¶ For August–December 2022, variable was collected for residents only and reported as unknown for nonresidents.
** Cells with a numerical value in the range of 1–4 and cells that would allow for calculation of these small values have been suppressed.
†† Data reported from facilities physically situated in state only.
§§ Percentage is based on a total of 463,579 abortions reported among the areas that met reporting standards for the number of previous induced abortions.

† Data from 41 reporting areas; excludes 11 reporting areas (California, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York State, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin) that did not report, did not report by gestational age, or did not meet reporting standards.
§ Percentages for the individual component categories might not add to 100% because of rounding.
¶ Percentage is calculated as the number of abortions reported by known gestational age divided by the sum of abortions reported by known and unknown gestational age. Values ≥99.95% are rounded to 100.0%.
** Two weeks were added to the probable postfertilization age to provide a corresponding measure to gestational age based on the clinician’s estimate.
†† Cells with a numerical value in the range of 1–4 and cells that would allow for calculation of these small values have been suppressed.
§§ For August–December 2022, variable was collected for residents only and reported as unknown for nonresidents.
¶¶ Data reported from facilities physically situated in state only.
*** Percentage is based on a total of 459,517 abortions reported among the areas that met reporting standards for gestational age.

• Data from 36 reporting areas; excludes 16 areas (California, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Florida, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York State, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Wisconsin, and Wyoming) that did not report, did not report by weeks of gestation, or did not meet reporting standards for ≥1 year.
  † Percentages for the individual component categories might not add to 100% because of rounding.
  § By year, the total number of abortions represents 72.7%–91.4% of all abortions reported to CDC among the areas that met reporting standards for gestational age during 2013–2022.

• Data from 47 reporting areas; excludes five reporting areas (California, Illinois, Maryland, New Hampshire, and New Jersey) that did not report, did not report by method type, or did not meet reporting standards. Areas reporting by method type with unknown gestational age or gestational age reported was not compatible with categorizations presented in this table are included.
  † Includes uterine aspiration (might also be called dilation and curettage, aspiration curettage, suction curettage, manual vacuum aspiration, menstrual extraction, or sharp curettage) and dilation and evacuation procedures.
  § Intrauterine instillation reported at ≤12 weeks’ gestation is considered as unknown for method type.
  ¶ Percentages for the individual component categories might not add to 100% because of rounding.
  ** Percentage is calculated as the number of abortions reported by known method type divided by the sum of abortions reported by known and unknown method type. Values ≥99.95% are rounded to 100.0%.
  †† Two weeks were added to the probable postfertilization age to provide a corresponding measure to gestational age based on the clinician’s estimate.
  §§ Cells with a numerical value in the range of 1–4 and cells that would allow for calculation of these small values have been suppressed.
  ¶¶ Numbers for surgical abortions ≤13 weeks’ and >13 weeks’ gestation and medication abortions ≤9 weeks’ versus >9 weeks’ gestation are not presented because gestational age reported was not compatible with these categorizations.
  *** Gestational age is based on clinician’s estimate. Numbers for medication abortions at ≤9 weeks versus >9 weeks are not presented because gestational age reported was not compatible with these categorizations.
  ††† Numbers for surgical abortions at ≤13 weeks’ versus >13 weeks’ gestation and for medication abortions at ≤9 weeks’ versus >9 weeks’ gestation are not presented because gestational age data were not provided by method type.
  §§§ For August–December 2022, variable was collected for residents only and reported as unknown for nonresidents.
  ¶¶¶ Data reported from facilities physically situated in state only.
  **** Includes residents only. Wisconsin reports as surgical, unspecified and does not differentiate surgical abortions from hysterectomy or hysterotomy. All abortions were reported as surgical or chemically induced. For this report, all surgical abortions were classified as surgical and all chemical abortions as medication.
  †††† For the total only, surgical abortions reported without a gestational age were distributed among the surgical abortion categories according to the distribution of surgical abortions at known gestational age.
  §§§§ For the total only, medication abortions reported without a gestational age were distributed among the medication abortion categories according to the distribution of medication abortions at known gestational age.
  ¶¶¶¶ Percentage is based on a total of 556,872 abortions reported among the areas that met reporting standards for method type.

• Data from 40 reporting areas; excludes 12 reporting areas (California, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York City, New York State, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin) that did not report, did not report by weeks of gestation, did not meet reporting standards, or did not have medication abortion as a specific category on their reporting form.
  † For each gestational age category, percentages of all method types might not add to 100% because of rounding.
  § Includes uterine aspiration (might also be called dilation and curettage, aspiration curettage, suction curettage, manual vacuum aspiration, menstrual extraction, or sharp curettage) and dilation and evacuation procedures.
  ¶ The administration of medication or medications to induce an abortion; at ≤9 weeks’ gestation, typically involves the use of mifepristone and misoprostol and at >9 weeks’ gestation, typically involves the use of vaginal prostaglandins.
  ** Intrauterine instillations reported at ≤12 weeks’ gestation have not been included with known values.

† Data from 40 reporting areas; excludes 12 reporting areas (California, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York City, New York State, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin) that did not report, did not report weeks of gestation by age, or did not meet reporting standards.
§ Data from 30 reporting areas; excludes 22 reporting areas (Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York City, New York State, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Washington, and Wisconsin) that did not report, did not report weeks of gestation by race and ethnicity, or did not meet reporting standards.
¶ Including Alaska Native, American Indian, Asian (Indian, Chinese, Filipino, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, or other Asian), Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander (Native Hawaiian, Guamanian or Chamorro, Samoan, or other Pacific Islander), other races, and multiple races.

• Number of legal induced abortion–related deaths per 100,000 reported legal induced abortions. Because a substantial number of legal induced abortions occurred outside reporting areas that provided data to CDC, national CFRs (i.e., number of legal induced abortion–related deaths per 100,000 reported legal induced abortions in the United States) were calculated with denominator data from the Guttmacher Institute’s national survey of abortion-providing facilities; for 2021, denominator data for 2020 were used, the most recent year for which data are available. CFRs were computed for consecutive 5-year periods during 1973–2012 and then for a consecutive 9-year period during 2013–2021 because rates based on † Certain numbers might differ from those in reports published previously because additional information has been supplied to CDC after publication.
  § An abortion is defined as legal if it was performed by a licensed clinician within the limits of state or jurisdiction law.
  ¶ Unknown whether abortion was induced or spontaneous.

Where this page came from

This page was imported from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Material produced by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is a work of the United States government and is in the public domain.

Nobody has written it yet — it is the source material at a new address, which is why search engines are asked to skip it and why no one earns from it. It is up for grabs: take it on, and it is yours to rewrite and to earn from.