logo

পাতার বিষয়বস্তু আরও ভালো করতে চান? একটি পরিবর্তনের প্রস্তাব দিন।

Kiran M. Perkins, MD1; Samantha Spoto, MSPH2; Danielle A. Rankin, MPH2; Nychie Q. Dotson, MPH2; Mary Malarkey3; Melissa Mendoza, JD3; Lorrie McNeill3; Paige Gable1; Krista M. Powell, MD1 (

Related Materials

The only Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved stem cell products are derived from umbilical cord blood, and their only approved use is hematopoietic and immunologic reconstitution (1). On September 17, 2018, the Texas Department of State Health Services received notification of Enterobacter cloacae and Citrobacter freundii bloodstream infections in three patients who had received injections or infusions of non-FDA–approved umbilical cord blood-derived stem cell products processed by Genetech, Inc., and distributed by Liveyon, LLC, for other than hematopoietic or immunologic reconstitution at an outpatient clinic on September 12. Patient isolates of E. cloacae had identical pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns, suggesting a common source. On September 22, the Florida Department of Health received notification of Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, and Proteus mirabilis joint infections in four patients who had received injections of these same products at an orthopedic clinic during February 15–August 30, 2018, also for other than hematopoietic or immunologic reconstitution. Cultures of unopened products from the clinic by a Florida hospital identified contamination with E. coli and E. faecalis. In response, on September 28, Liveyon issued a voluntary recall and immediately discontinued purchase of the Genetech-processed stem cell products (2,3). On October 4, CDC issued a nationwide call for reports of culture-confirmed infections in patients who had received the Liveyon product.

As of December 14, CDC has received reports of infections in 12 patients from three states, including the initial Florida and Texas cases: Texas (seven), Florida (four), and Arizona (one). Infection types included bloodstream infections, joint infections, and epidural abscesses, among others. All 12 patients received infusions or injections of Liveyon’s product before the recall. Among 11 patients for whom conditions prompting product administration were known, all had nonhematopoietic conditions such as pain or orthopedic conditions. All patients were hospitalized; none died (

CDC tested unopened vials obtained from the Texas and Florida clinics where the initial patients had received the product. The six vials from Texas had the same cord-blood donor and processing date as those that had been administered to the patients with infections. E. cloacae was isolated from all six vials; C. freundii also was isolated from five. The four vials from Florida were from different donors and processing dates than were the vials from Texas. E. coli was isolated from one of two vials from the same cord-blood donor and processing date; E.coli and E. faecalis were isolated from one of two vials from two unique donors with unique processing dates.

Ongoing investigations include active case finding, additional laboratory testing to compare clinical and product isolates, onsite assessments of health care facility infection control and injection safety practices, and investigation of manufacturing practices (including distribution); initial investigation suggests that bacterial contamination occurred before distribution. Umbilical cord blood cannot be decontaminated after collection because there are currently no validated processes for sterilization, so manufacture of derived products must be highly controlled to prevent distribution of contaminated products (4). The Genetech-processed, Liveyon-distributed product is not FDA-approved or lawfully marketed. Though Genetech and Liveyon are registered with FDA, such registration is not a form of FDA approval. FDA registration alone does not demonstrate compliance of firms or their products with the law.

Regardless of when contamination occurred, this investigation highlights the serious potential risks to patients of stem cell therapies administered for unapproved and unproven uses other than hematopoietic or immunologic reconstitution (5). Although the safety and efficacy of stem cells for other than hematopoietic or immunologic reconstitution have not been well established (1,4), many companies, clinics, and clinicians continue to market products from various sources as treatment for orthopedic, neurologic, and rheumatologic conditions without FDA approval. Such clinics and providers operate in outpatient settings, which often have less robust oversight of infection control measures, including injection safety and medication preparation (6), potentially amplifying risk to patients. Therefore, FDA has recommended that patients avoid receiving such products outside controlled clinical studies being conducted under an investigational new drug application; these settings help ensure that appropriate manufacturing and safety reporting procedures are followed (1). Health care professionals and consumers should report any adverse events related to treatment with the Genetech/Liveyon products or any unapproved stem cell therapies to FDA’s MedWatch Safety Information and Adverse Event Reporting Program (https://www.fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/).

Acknowledgments

Rachana Bhattarai, PhD, Kara Tarter, MPH, Arizona Department of Health Services; Robert Hunter, MS, Jon Rosenberg, MD, California Department of Public Health; Scott Pritchard, MPH, Virginia Warren, MPH, Bureau of Public Health Laboratories, Florida Department of Health; Texas Department of State Health Services; Ana Cecilia Bardossy, Gregory Eckert-Raczniak, MD, PhD, Kathleen Hartnett, PhD, MD, Heather Moulton-Meissner, PhD, CDC.

Corresponding author: Kiran M. Perkins, KPerkins@cdc.gov, 404-639-1161.

1Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, CDC; 2Florida Department of Health; 3Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.

All authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

References

PatientRoute/Site of administrationDate administeredSettingCondition prompting product administration*Specimen collection date, first positive cultureOrganism isolatedInfection siteDays of initial hospitalization to treat infection
1Intra-articular injection, knee and shoulderFeb 15, 2018Orthopedic clinicDegenerative joint diseaseFeb 21, 2018Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilisKnee15
2Intra-articular injection, lumbar spineJun 13, 2018Pain clinicPainJun 14, 2018Escherichia coliBloodstream4
3Intra-articular injection, lumbar spineJul 27, 2018Ambulatory surgery centerPainAug 1, 2018Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalisBloodstream, lumbosacral epidural abscess, discitis, and vertebral osteomyelitis †58
4Intra-articular injection, knee and shoulderAug 3, 2018Orthopedic clinicUnknownAug 10, 2018Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalisKnee30
5Intra-articular injection, shouldersAug 14, 2018Chiropractic clinicOsteoarthritisAug 29, 2018Escherichia coliBloodstream, shoulders8
6Intra-articular injection, shoulderAug 22, 2018Orthopedic clinicRotator cuff tear with intrasynovial cystSep 9, 2018Escherichia coliShoulder6
7Intra-articular injection, lumbar spineAug 28, 2018Spine treatment clinicLumbar back painSep 1, 2018Citrobacter koseriBloodstream6
8Intra-articular injection, lumbar spineAug 29, 2018Pain clinicPainSep 4, 2018Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalisBloodstream35
9Intra-articular injection, kneeAug 30, 2018Orthopedic clinicOsteoarthritisSep 7, 2018Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalisKnee5
10Intra-articular injection, cervical spineSep 12, 2018Pain clinicPainSep 15, 2018Enterobacter cloacae, Citrobacter freundiiBloodstream, cellulitis at injection site §9
11Intra-articular injection, cervical and lumbar spineSep 12, 2018Pain clinicPain (history of rheumatoid arthritis)Sep 16, 2018Enterobacter cloacae, Citrobacter freundiiBloodstream12
12Intra-articular injection, lumbar spine and index fingers; intravenous infusionSep 12, 2018Pain clinicPain, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritisSep 16, 2018Enterobacter cloacaeBloodstream, lumbar epidural abscess12

† Abscess and vertebrae were not cultured; both organisms were isolated from blood, and E. faecalis only was isolated from disc space.
§ No organisms were isolated from skin; both organisms were isolated from blood.

Where this page came from

This page was imported from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Material produced by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is a work of the United States government and is in the public domain.

Nobody has written it yet — it is the source material at a new address, which is why search engines are asked to skip it and why no one earns from it. It is up for grabs: take it on, and it is yours to rewrite and to earn from.

লাইসেন্স: CC0 1.0 (পাবলিক ডোমেইন) · গৃহীত হয়েছে www.cdc.gov

1

0

0

0

Spinner Logo

মন্তব্য

Spinner Logo
সংস্করণ: 1রক্ষণাবেক্ষণকারী: 1বিভাগসমূহ: 0CC0 1.0 — public domain
Planetary Nebula
সংস্করণ: 1রক্ষণাবেক্ষণকারী: 1বিভাগসমূহ: 0CC0 1.0 — public domain
Doradus Nebula
সংস্করণ: 1রক্ষণাবেক্ষণকারী: 1বিভাগসমূহ: 0CC0 1.0 — public domain
The Tarantula Nebula
সংস্করণ: 1রক্ষণাবেক্ষণকারী: 1বিভাগসমূহ: 0CC0 1.0 — public domain
Hubble reveals heart of Lagoon Nebula
সংস্করণ: 1রক্ষণাবেক্ষণকারী: 1বিভাগসমূহ: 0CC0 1.0 — public domain
Hubble Images Searchlight Beams from a Preplanetary Nebula
সংস্করণ: 1রক্ষণাবেক্ষণকারী: 1বিভাগসমূহ: 0CC0 1.0 — public domain
Hubble View of a Nitrogen-Rich Nebula