Hub Nexus
Opdateret

ForfatterIngen forfatter endnuOvertag den

Ser du noget at forbedre? Foreslå en ændring.

Støtte

Difficulty accessing large grocery stores may increase reliance on smaller stores and restaurants, possibly resulting in a poor diet and diet-related health problems. ERS researchers used data captured in USDA’s National Household Food Acquisition and Purchase Survey (FoodAPS) to examine if differences in how far low-income households live from large grocery stores and whether they own a car influences their food spending behaviors. The researchers found that low-income households with more difficult access spent a similar share of their food budgets at large food stores but a greater share at convenience, dollar, and drugstores compared with households with easier access.

FoodAPS includes 2,778 low-income households of which nearly 60 percent participated in USDA’s Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). ERS researchers divided the low-income FoodAPS respondents into two groups:

  • access-burdened households that lived farther than 0.5 of a mile from the nearest SNAP-authorized supermarket or superstore and relied on a form of transportation other than their own vehicle (such as arranging rides with friends or using public transportation), and
  • sufficient-access households that lived either within 0.5 of a mile of the nearest SNAP-authorized supermarket or superstore or used their own vehicle to shop for food.

The researchers found that low-income access-burdened and sufficient-access households spent similar shares of their weekly food spending at grocery stores. Both groups spent 57-58 percent of their weekly food expenditures (an average of $27.54 per person) at large grocery stores—supermarkets, superstores, and club stores—and 3 to 5 percent at small grocery, ethnic, and specialty food stores.

Differences between the two low-income access groups did arise in spending at eating places and at convenience, dollar, drug, and other small stores. Access-burdened households spent 11 percent of their food expenditures at these stores ($3.22 per person per week) compared with the 5-percent share for sufficient-access households ($1.93 per person per week).

If a household lives farther from grocery stores and does not have a car to travel to such stores, the household may fill the grocery gap with purchases at nearby eating places. However, this was not the case for low-income households. The ERS study found that low-income access-burdened households spent a smaller percentage of their food budget at eating places than low-income sufficient-access households.

A bar chart showing the share of weekly food expenditures by place type for households with sufficient access and burdened access to large grocery stores

This article is drawn from:

Ver Ploeg, M.,
Larimore, E.
& Wilde, P.E.
(2017). The Influence of Food Store Access on Grocery Shopping and Food Spending.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
EIB-180.

Where this page came from

This page was imported from USDA Economic Research Service. Published by the USDA Economic Research Service and, as a work of the United States government, in the public domain.

Nobody has written it yet — it is the source material at a new address, which is why search engines are asked to skip it and why no one earns from it. It is up for grabs: take it on, and it is yours to rewrite and to earn from.

SprogEnglish

Licens: CC0 1.0 (offentligt eje) · Bearbejdet efter www.ers.usda.gov

1

0

0

0

Spinner Logo

Kommentarer

Spinner Logo
Version: 2CC0 1.0 — public domain
The runaway star that left the Tarantula Nebula
Version: 2CC0 1.0 — public domain
The Blackwell School, where segregation had no law behind it
Version: 2CC0 1.0 — public domain
The Eagle Nebula, seen in the infrared
Version: 2CC0 1.0 — public domain
The house where the Equal Rights Amendment was written
Version: 2CC0 1.0 — public domain
The Aleutians, the forgotten front of the Second World War
Version: 2CC0 1.0 — public domain
The Cosmic Cliffs are not cliffs