Willst du den Inhalt der Seite besser machen? Schlag eine Änderung vor.
On 8 September 2022, an emergency physician rang the New Jersey poison
centre about a child aged 23 months who had swallowed a weight-loss
supplement their mother had bought, labelled Mexican Tejocote Root.
| The child | |
|---|---|
| Heart rate | 90 bpm (normal for that age: 98–135) |
| Blood pressure | 71/60 mmHg |
| ECG | sinus bradycardia, frequent premature ventricular complexes, scooped ST segments — consistent with cardenolide toxicity |
Cardenolides are the class of cardiac poison that includes digoxin.
Yellow oleander contains one, thevetin B.
The treatment, and the detail that nearly hid the diagnosis
A serum digoxin assay returned 0.5 ng/L — a level the poison centre read
as cross-reactivity with a non-digoxin cardiac glycoside, not as digoxin.
That interpretation is what connected a bradycardic toddler to a plant toxin.
The child was given digoxin-specific antibody fragments, the digoxin
antidote, and the ECG and blood pressure normalised.
Twelve hours later the ECG again showed cardenolide toxicity. A **second
dose** was needed before it stayed normal.
The relapse matters clinically: the toxin outlasted the first dose of antidote,
so a patient who looks recovered is not necessarily finished.
How widespread it was
The poison centre bought **10 products labelled tejocote and sold online as
weight-loss supplements** in December 2022 — each listed on a separate page,
though some carried the same or similar labels — and sent them to a laboratory
specialising in supplement analysis, which compared them against **authenticated
tejocote root** verified by an ethnobotanist.
**Nine of 10 products labelled as tejocote were yellow oleander, with no
evidence of tejocote root.**
Not contamination. Substitution — the labelled plant was simply absent, and a
cardiotoxic one was there instead.
What the regulation says, and what it delivered
**US dietary supplement regulations require that all ingredients be tested for
identity and be free from reasonably anticipated contaminants.**
Nine of ten products failed the first of those, and the failure was found only
because a toddler ended up in hospital and somebody thought to buy the rest.
Earlier DNA fingerprinting of another brand had already found it **100%
yellow oleander** — so this was known, and the products stayed on sale.
Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, MMWR.
Lizenz: CC0 1.0 (gemeinfrei) · Bearbeitet nach www.cdc.gov
1
0
0
0

Kommentare

Weiterlesen





