



The Sopwith Camel is among the most significant and famous of all WWI aircraft. Camels downed 1,294 enemy aircraft, more than any other Allied fighter in WWI. The cowling over the two Vickers machine guns ahead of the cockpit created a distinctive “hump,” making the name Camel a natural choice, although it was never an official military designation.
Unlike the earlier Sopwith Pup and Sopwith Triplane, which were docile to fly and well-liked by pilots, the Camel was unstable, requiring constant input from the pilot. The gyroscopic effects of its powerful rotary engine made it dangerous for novice pilots, and almost as many were killed in accidents as died in combat. But its instability also contributed to it being agile and maneuverable, and once its tricky characteristics were mastered, the Camel was a superior fighting airplane.
The Camel entered operational service in July 1917 and remained a front-line fighter until the end of the war, with approximately 5,490 built. This example, B6291, served with No. 10 Squadron of the Royal Naval Air Service.
- Single engine, single-seat, WWI biplane fighter, with 130 HP Clerget 9B rotary engine.
| Country of Origin | United Kingdom |
| Materials | Airframe: wood, fabric covered |
| Materials | metal |
| Materials | rubber |
| Dimensions | Wingspan: 28 feet (8.5 m) |
| Dimensions | Length: 18 feet 9 inches (5.7 m) |
| Dimensions | Height: 8 feet 6 inches (2.6m) |
| Dimensions | Empty weight: 930 lbs |
| Credit Line | Gift of the Arango Family in Memory of Javier F. Arango |
| Inventory Number | A20170105000 |
Where this page came from
This page was imported from Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum. Released by the Smithsonian Institution under CC0 through Smithsonian Open Access.
Nobody has written it yet — it is the source material at a new address, which is why search engines are asked to skip it and why no one earns from it. It is up for grabs: take it on, and it is yours to rewrite and to earn from.
Licence: CC0 1.0 (public domain) · Adapted from n2t.net
1
0
0
0

Comments






