Hub Nexus
Actualizado

AutorAún sin autorAsumirla

¿Ves algo que mejorar? Propón un cambio.

Apoyo

Local foods represent a small but growing share of the U.S. food system—one reflection of consumers’ increasing influence on food production. Local food producers sell their goods directly to consumers at places such as farmers markets, on-farm stores, or pick-your-own stores. They also sell to retailers such as restaurants or grocery stores, institutions such as schools, universities, or hospitals, and intermediaries such as processors or wholesalers. Local and regional food systems provide significant income for many farmers, which supports rural communities, beginning farmers, and small-scale farmers. According to data from the USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), sales of local edible farm products in 2017 totaled $11.8 billion, or 3 percent of all agricultural sales in 2017, up from $8.7 billion in 2015.

Historically, local farmers have mostly sold their products directly to consumers in farmers markets or other dedicated outlets. As directed under the 2014 Farm Bill, NASS conducted a first-time survey to produce official benchmark data on the local food sectors in all 50 States. Researchers from the USDA, Economic Research Service (ERS) recently used data from this survey, conducted in 2016, to evaluate how local food farmers of varying levels of experience responded to an increasing demand for local food as documented in earlier studies.

An ERS report and other studies show that a higher percentage of local food sales in 2015 were through retailers, institutions, and intermediate markets, rather than directly to consumers. The survey showed most local foods were sold through intermediate markets and institutions (39 percent), followed by direct-to-consumer (34 percent) and retailers (27 percent). Researchers have found that most of the growth in local food sales has come through intermediaries, institutions, and retailers as the growing popularity of these markets has led to a plateau in direct-to-consumer sales. For example, a 2018 article in the journal Ecological Economics indicates that consumers are not willing to pay a premium for local food at farmers markets compared to grocery stores. According to the article, this is possibly because of limited product offerings at farmers markets and increases in the time and effort to fulfill grocery needs since consumers may need to shop at multiple locations.

Observers often gauge the popularity of local foods by growth in the number of farmers markets. However, on-site farm stores and farm stands were by far the most popular marketing channel for direct-to-consumer sales in 2015. On-site farm stores or stands accounted for 15 percent of all local food sales that year, and 31 percent of farms with local food sales had on-site farm stores or stands. Eight percent of all local food sales were through farmers markets, and 25 percent of farms selling local food used this marketing channel in 2015. Twenty-four percent of farms with local food sales in 2015 sold through other types of direct-to-consumer outlets—such as pick-your-own or mobile markets—and those sales made up 5 percent of total local food sales.

Only 6.4 percent of local food producers sold through all four direct marketing channels (consumers, retailers, institutions, and intermediate markets). Farmers with different levels of farming experience may prefer certain direct marketing channels over others. For example, farmers with 10 or fewer years of farming experience may find it easier to enter the direct-to-consumer marketing channel than other marketing channels. Increased understanding of how farmers sell local foods can inform future programs and policies to support local foods and beginning farmers.

Two pie charts, one showing the percent of local food sales by type of outlet, and another showing share of local foods sold through six direct-to-consumer outlets.

This article is drawn from:

Martinez, S.
& Park, T.
(2021). Marketing Practices and Financial Performance of Local Food Producers: A Comparison of Beginning and Experienced Farmers.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
EIB-225.

You may also like:

ARMS Farm Financial and Crop Production Practices.
(n.d.).
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

Low, S.A.,
Adalja, A.,
Beaulieu, E.,
Key, N.,
Martinez, S.,
Melton, A.,
Perez, A.,
Ralston, K.,
Stewart, H.,
Suttles, S.,
Vogel, S.
& Jablonski, B.B.R.
(2015). Trends in U.S. Local and Regional Food Systems: A Report to Congress.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
AP-068.

Martinez, S.,
Hand, M.S.,
Da Pra, M.,
Pollack, S.,
Ralston, K.,
Smith, T.,
Vogel, S.,
Suttles, S.,
Lohr, L.,
Low, S.A.
& Newman, C.
(2010). Local Food Systems: Concepts, Impacts, and Issues.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
ERR-97.

Where this page came from

This page was imported from USDA Economic Research Service. Published by the USDA Economic Research Service and, as a work of the United States government, in the public domain.

Nobody has written it yet — it is the source material at a new address, which is why search engines are asked to skip it and why no one earns from it. It is up for grabs: take it on, and it is yours to rewrite and to earn from.

IdiomasEnglish

Licencia: CC0 1.0 (dominio público) · Adaptado de www.ers.usda.gov

1

0

0

0

Spinner Logo

Comentarios

Spinner Logo
Versión: 2CC0 1.0 — public domain
The runaway star that left the Tarantula Nebula
Versión: 2CC0 1.0 — public domain
The Blackwell School, where segregation had no law behind it
Versión: 2CC0 1.0 — public domain
The Eagle Nebula, seen in the infrared
Versión: 2CC0 1.0 — public domain
The house where the Equal Rights Amendment was written
Versión: 2CC0 1.0 — public domain
The Aleutians, the forgotten front of the Second World War
Versión: 2CC0 1.0 — public domain
The Cosmic Cliffs are not cliffs