Methodology for the Building Assessment Survey and Evaluation Study

Between 1994 and 1998, data and samples were collected in each of 100 office buildings using a Standardized Protocol over a one-week period during either the summer or winter season. The protocol provides detailed information on the procedures used for conducting the building investigations and occupant surveys in each of the BASE buildings.

Supporting information, a set of checklists developed to consistently collect information on the whole building and the study areas, and a sample questionnaire are provided in the appendices of the protocol.

• Review the

A Standardized EPA Protocol for Characterizing IAQ in Large Office Buildings (pdf)

(1.47 MB)

Overview of Field Data Collection Activities During Study Week

• Select and Recruit Buildings
• Initial Visit to Eligible Buildings
• Create a Study Team
• Select Study Areas and Monitoring Locations
• Monitor Study AreasWhole Building and Study Areas Characterization
• Environmental Monitoring
• HVAC Characterization
• Quality Assurance/Quality Control
• Survey Occupants of Study Areas
• Validation of data as specified in the Quality Assurance Project Plan

Select and Recruit Buildings

Buildings selected and recruited for monitoring represent both public and commercial office buildings in the United States. The buildings were randomly selected within the chosen city without regard to indoor air quality concerns except that buildings with highly publicized indoor air quality concerns were excluded. Both complaint and non-complaint buildings may be included in the study. A detailed discussion of the BASE building selection process is contained in the report:

Summary and Analysis Report of the BASE Study Building Selection Process (pdf)

(1.31 MB)

It was important that the suitability of a building be established well ahead of conducting the monitoring. Therefore, if a building met the eligibility requirements and the building manager/owner was interested in participating in the study, an on-site preliminary visit (PV) was scheduled as soon as possible after the building was selected and recruited into the study.

• See the schematic flowchart of the

Summary and Analysis Report of the BASE Study Building Selection Process (pdf)

(1.31 MB)

Initial Visit to Eligible Buildings

Initial visits for eligible buildings in a given city were conducted over the course of a week. The objectives of the visits were to verify the suitability of the building for the study, to identify potential study areas for monitoring, to select one or more study areas for monitoring, and to collect information that could be used to select monitoring locations within the study areas.

Information on the whole building was collected during the initial visit using standardized checklists available in the appendices of the Standardized Protocol. Information collected included:

• space use
• occupancy
• climate and site
• building and HVAC equipment
• building envelope
• potential pollutant sources.

Based on the initial visit, a building was considered suitable for inclusion in the monitoring study if it has at least one space that met the BASE criteria for designating a building space as a study areas, see the following table. The final test buildings were randomly selected from all buildings found to be eligible within the chosen test city.

Table 1: Criteria for Designating a BASE Building Space as Study Areas

Create a Study Team

A four to five-person study team was formed for each building. Each study team was responsible for all data collection, data reduction and data entry activities associated with individual buildings or a group of buildings monitored as part of the BASE study.

Each study team designated a study team leader, field team leader, analysis team leader, sample custodian, survey administrator, data management specialist and QA officer prior to field monitoring activities. The same individual could be designated to perform several of these functions. However, the QA officer was independent of the study team technical staff and routine sampling and analysis activities to avoid the potential for conflict of interest. EPA determined a List of Team Responsibilities and Experience Requirements necessary to ensure program success.

U.S. EPA BASE Study: Responsibilities and Qualifications for Study Team Members

Select Study Areas and Monitoring Locations

Sample of fixed indoor monitoring station

Sample of fixed outdoor monitoring station

A test space, also referred to as the study space, was selected in each building using established criteria, see Table 1 above.

Potential study areas within each building were defined and then one or more study areas were randomly selected for more extensive evaluation. Within the selected study areas three fixed indoor sites and one outdoor site as close as possible to the fresh air intake of the primary air handling unit, or AHU, serving the study area, were selected for taking physical and chemical measurements based upon a set procedure.

On the Monday morning of the field week monitoring locations were randomly selected using a set procedure. Two types of monitoring locations, fixed and mobile (see the Indoor Air Quality Glossary), were established in each building based on established guidelines. Fixed indoor monitoring locations and a fixed outdoor monitoring location were selected during the initial field visit. The outdoor site was selected to be as close as possible to the fresh air intake of the primary AHU serving the study space. Five mobile indoor monitoring locations were also established in each study area.

Monitor Study Areas

Monitoring was performed in the study areas during a one-week period to generate data on heating, ventilation and air-conditioning, or HVAC, system operation, environmental pollutants, and comfort factors. Checklists were used to consistently collect information on the whole building, the HVAC, and the study areas. These checklists are available in appendices of the 2003 Standardized BASE Protocol.

• Whole Building and Study Areas Characterization
• Environmental Monitoring
• HVAC Characterization
• Quality Assurance/Quality Control

Whole Building and Study Area Characterization

Information on the whole building was collected during the initial visit to the building. During the field test week, the field team leader reviewed and verified the information collected previously and recorded any changes that may have occurred since the site visit. Information on the study areas and specific sources were collected early in the week of measurements at the building.

Environmental Monitoring

Environmental monitoring included measurements for both comfort factors and environmental pollutants. Monitoring was performed with both real-time and integrated measurement methods (see the I-BEAM Glossary of Terms) at the selected fixed and mobile sites. A listing of core parameters and sample collection methods used during the BASE study is available in the following table.

Core Parameters and Sample Collection Methods

HVAC Characterization

Core HVAC measurement parameters for each AHU that serves the study area in mechanically ventilated buildings included:

• direct volumetric measurements of airflow quantities, such as outdoor air intake rate and supply airflow, where possible.
• carbon dioxide (CO2) measurements in HVAC air streams to estimate the percentage of outdoor air relative to total supply air flow, where possible.
• temperature and the relative humidity in the HVAC air streams.

Measurements were also made at the air supply air diffusers located within the study areas, including:

• air flows
• temperatures
• the relative humidity
• carbon monoxide levels

In naturally ventilated buildings, the core measurement parameters included:

• continuous carbon dioxide measurements
• measurements of exhaust fan airflow rate
• the twice-daily check of exhaust fan operation

Quality Assurance/Quality Control

In addition to the field samples, various quality control, or QC, samples were collected and analyzed during the study. The study team collected field samples and blanks. In addition to these samples, laboratory blanks and controls were prepared for each building by the analytical laboratory. These samples were to be analyzed if contamination or poor recovery was found on the field blanks. At each building, one field blank and one duplicate sample for each type of integrated sample were analyzed. More information on the procedures used to ensure consistent collection and reporting of quality data is available:

Building Assessment Survey and Evaluation Study: Quality Assurance Project Plan (pdf)

(75.22 KB)

A Standardized EPA Protocol for Characterizing IAQ in Large Office Buildings (pdf)

(1.47 MB)

In addition, a detailed discussion of the accuracy and precision of the data can be found in the

The Precision and Accuracy of Environmental Measurements for the Building Assessment Survey and Evaluation Program (pdf)

(221.07 KB)

Survey Occupants in Study Areas

Occupants in the study areas were surveyed on perceived IAQ and health symptoms using a self-administered questionnaire available in Appendix F of the Standardized Protocol on Thursday of the week of field monitoring. To help ensure that environmental monitoring and survey data would be applicable to the same group of people, the questionnaire was administered to full-time individuals (20 or more hours per week) whose primary workstation is in the study areas.

Although the survey was conducted using a self-administered questionnaire, one member of the field team was designated as a survey administrator. The survey administrator’s responsibility was to:

• enlist occupant participation
• provide the elements of informed consent
• distribute and collect the questionnaire
• ensure questionnaire confidentiality
• make every attempt to collect data from all eligible occupants using specified procedures

Where this page came from

This page was imported from U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Published by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and, as a work of the United States government, in the public domain; material credited to others is left out.

Nobody has written it yet — it is the source material at a new address, which is why search engines are asked to skip it and why no one earns from it. It is up for grabs: take it on, and it is yours to rewrite and to earn from.