본문으로 건너뛰기
Hub Nexus
업데이트됨

작성자아직 작성자가 없습니다맡기

개선할 점이 보이나요? 변경을 제안하세요.

후원

이 페이지는 공개 상태입니다.

General Principles

Certain offences mandate higher penalties where there is a prior conviction for the offence. The higher penalty can only be sought where the Crown has given notice of their intention to seek greater punishment.

Offences for which this applies include:

By failing to give proper notice the Crown cannot rely upon the legislated mandatory minimums. However, a judge may still consider the prior record when sentencing and can impose the mandatory minimum as long as it is in the range of sentence.[1]

  • ↑
    R v Norris, (1988) 41 C.C.C. (3d) 441 (N.W.T.C.A.)

Notice

Notice of increased penalty is governed by s. 727(1):

  1. (1) Subject to subsections (3) and (4), where an accused or a defendant is convicted of an offence for which a greater punishment may be imposed by reason of previous convictions, no greater punishment shall be imposed on him by reason thereof unless the prosecutor satisfies the court that the accused or defendant, before making his plea, was notified that a greater punishment would be sought by reason thereof.

– CCC

Section 727(1) does not specifically require written notice, thus, both written or verbal notice is sufficient.[1]

There is divided cases on whether the accused must be served personally or whether service on the agent or counsel is sufficient.[2]
The dominant opinion however has been that service of notice upon counsel is sufficient to satisfy the requirements of s.727(1) and that personal service is not necessary.[3]
In select jurisdictions, such as Saskatchewan, it has been determined that service upon an agent, including a relative, is also sufficient.[4]

It is not sufficient to notify the accused that the Crown “may” be seeking a greater punishment.[5]

It is not necessary to notify the accused of the nature and character of the penalty sought, including the length of the possible jail sentence.[6]

There is no need for “reasonable notice”. So notice can be given on the day of trial.[7]

Notice must be given to the accused of the Crown's intention to seek a greater penalty for past offences.[8]

Although it is generally practiced, it is not necessary to specify the previous convictions being relied upon when giving notice.[9]

There are two lines of cases on the issue of whether the notice is discretionary on the judge to accept. This turns on whether the notice is part of the core prosecutorial duties which are not reviewable by a court absent evidence of abuse of process or bad faith.[10]

Cases is support of the crown discretion view suggests that to do otherwise would create too much second guessing and erode the boundary between the separatoin of powers.[11]

Where the crown does not serve proper notice under s. 727, then the accused cannot be said to have been convicted "of an offence that is punishable by a minimum term of imprisonment" under s.742.1, and so would not disqualify the offender from being subject to a conditional sentence.[12]

↑ R v Collini (1979) 3 MVR 218 (Ont HCJ)

  • ↑
    R. v. Beaulieu; R. v. Lepine (1979), 50 C.C.C. (2d) 189 (Que. S.C.)
  • ↑

R. v. Fowler, (1982), 2 C.C.C. (3d) 227 (NSCA)

R. v. Simms, (1986), 31 C.C.C. (3d) 350 (NLCA)

R. v. Godon, (1984), 12 C.C.C. (3d) 446, (SKCA)

R. v. Van Boeyen, 1996 CanLII 8372 (BC CA)

  • ↑ R. v. Godon, (1984), 12 C.C.C. (3d) 446, (SKCA)
  • ↑

R . v. Riley (1982), 69 C.C.C. (2d) 245 (Ont. High Ct.)

  • ↑
    R v Bear (1979), 47 C.C.C. (2d) 462 (Sask C.A.)
  • ↑ R v Bufford (1988) 46 CCC (3d) 116 (Ont.DC)
  • ↑ R. v. Zaccaria, 2005 ABCA 130 [1]; R. v. Veinot (1983), NSCA__
  • ↑ R v Pidlubny (1973) 10 CCC (2d) 178 (ONCA)
  • ↑

R. v. Haneveld 2008 ABPC 382 - not reviewable by court

R. v. Gill, 2011 ONSC 1145 - reviewable by court

  • ↑ R v Mohla [2012] OJ No. 388 at 164
  • ↑

R. v. Demchuk, 2003 CanLII 15723 (ON CA)

Where this page came from

This page was imported from Wikibooks. From “Canadian Criminal Sentencing” on Wikibooks, by its contributors, under CC BY-SA 4.0. Changed here: set as a page; navigation and edit links left out; each image under its own licence, credited in its caption.

Nobody has written it yet — it is the source material at a new address, which is why search engines are asked to skip it and why no one earns from it. It is up for grabs: take it on, and it is yours to rewrite and to earn from.

이 페이지가 속한 매거진Canadian Criminal Sentencing

언어English

이용 허락: CC BY-SA 4.0 · 출처 en.wikibooks.org

견해

코멘트

Spinner Logo
버전: 2CC0 1.0 (퍼블릭 도메인)
The runaway star that left the Tarantula Nebula
버전: 2CC0 1.0 (퍼블릭 도메인)
The Eagle Nebula, seen in the infrared
버전: 2CC0 1.0 (퍼블릭 도메인)
The Cosmic Cliffs are not cliffs
버전: 2CC0 1.0 (퍼블릭 도메인)
The recommended targets are real, but the largest health gain is between doing nothing and doing a little. That is the part worth knowing if you are starting from nothing.
버전: 2CC0 1.0 (퍼블릭 도메인)
Sleep is not one state but a cycle through several, each doing different work. Most sleep disorders are a failure to complete that cycle rather than a shortage of hours.
버전: 2CC0 1.0 (퍼블릭 도메인)
Four nebulae that revealed the shape of our galaxy