Hub Nexus
Updated

AuthorNo author yetClaim it

See something to improve? Propose a change.

Support

Most agricultural lenders extend loans based on their assessment of a borrower’s ability to repay debt. Because of this, some farmers may not be able to secure as much credit as they would like for their farm businesses. A lack of credit could prevent these farmers from expanding production or could restrict investments in productivity-enhancing technologies. Off-farm income may help some farm households qualify for larger loans, which could lead to higher farm output, productivity, and profit.

Using farm-level data from USDA’s Agricultural Resource Management Survey, the USDA, Economic Research Service (ERS) estimated the effect of off-farm income on farm borrowing, investment, operation size and productivity from 2007 to 2016. ERS compared farms that had similar characteristics but differed in the educational attainment of the operator’s spouse. Including educational attainment in the statistical model allowed ERS to clearly identify the primary relationships of interest because the differences in educational attainment were linked to variations in off-farm income. For example, farm households in which the spouse did not graduate from high school earned an average of $62,400 (including investments) off farm per year, compared with $141,000 when the spouse completed at least 4 years of college.

The study found a correlation between higher off-farm earnings and increases in investment and borrowing. A 1-percent increase in the spouse’s off-farm income was associated with increases of 0.7 percent for total farm debt, 0.6 percent for short-term debt, 2.9 percent for long-term debt, and 3.0 percent for capital expenditures. Off-farm income was connected to output and farm size. A 1-percent increase in off-farm income increased the total value of farm production by 0.8 percent and the total value of farm assets by 0.4 percent. Along with more investment and a larger farm, a 1-percent increase in the spouse’s off-farm income was associated with a 0.7 percentage-point increase in the ratio of gross cash farm income to total expenses (considered a measure of productivity).

The findings suggest that additional off-farm income could ease the credit constraint many farmers face, thus increasing their ability to borrow and invest. That would permit producers to put more money into their farmland and equipment, thereby increasing productivity.

Horizontal bar chart showing effect of off-farm income on total debt, short-term debt, long-term debt, capital expenditures, value of production, farm assets, and gross cash farm income/total expense from 2007-2016.

This article is drawn from:

Key, N.
(2020). “Off-farm Income, Credit Constraints, and Farm Investment”.
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. 52(4): 642-663.

You may also like:

Farm Household Well-being.
(n.d.).
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

Where this page came from

This page was imported from USDA Economic Research Service. Published by the USDA Economic Research Service and, as a work of the United States government, in the public domain.

Nobody has written it yet — it is the source material at a new address, which is why search engines are asked to skip it and why no one earns from it. It is up for grabs: take it on, and it is yours to rewrite and to earn from.

LanguagesEnglish

Licence: CC0 1.0 (public domain) · Adapted from www.ers.usda.gov

1

0

0

0

Spinner Logo

Comments

Spinner Logo
Version: 2CC0 1.0 — public domain
The runaway star that left the Tarantula Nebula
Version: 2CC0 1.0 — public domain
The Blackwell School, where segregation had no law behind it
Version: 2CC0 1.0 — public domain
The Eagle Nebula, seen in the infrared
Version: 2CC0 1.0 — public domain
The house where the Equal Rights Amendment was written
Version: 2CC0 1.0 — public domain
The Aleutians, the forgotten front of the Second World War
Version: 2CC0 1.0 — public domain
The Cosmic Cliffs are not cliffs