Hub Nexus
Updated

AuthorNo author yetClaim it

See something to improve? Propose a change.

Support

A person in waders standing in a shallow, rocky mountain creek beneath a steep, eroded bank.

Measuring streamflow on Grouse Creek, Moran, Wyoming, June 18, 2019. Photograph by Cheryl Miller, U.S. Geological Survey.

This U.S. Geological Survey summary describes the nation's streamflow in water year 2019 — October 1, 2018, to September 30, 2019 — ranked against the 90 water years from 1930 to 2019. It uses observed data from the USGS National Streamgage Network; before 1930 there were too few gauges for meaningful statistics in most regions. Some of the data are provisional.

How to read the rankings

  • Runoff is the water flowing in a stream divided by the area of its drainage basin, so places of different sizes can be compared. For an area and period it is computed from every gauge there with a complete record.
  • Rank 1 is the highest flow of the 90 years; rank 90 the lowest.
  • Ranks fall into five groups by percentile of flow:
CategoryPercentile of flowRank
Much below normalunder 10%82–89 (90 = driest)
Below normal10–24%69–81
Normal25–75%23–68
Above normal76–90%10–22
Much above normalover 90%2–9 (1 = wettest)

A record high or low is not shown where ranks tie. Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands have 76 years of data, and their ranks are adjusted accordingly.

The nation

Runoff in the contiguous United States was 13.62 inches, far above the 1930–2019 mean of 9.37 inches. Water year 2019 ranked highest of the 90 years.

Line graph of yearly runoff in the contiguous United States from 1930 to 2019, varying around a mean of 9.37 inches and ending at a peak of 13.62 inches in 2019.

Figure 1. Annual runoff in the contiguous United States, water years 1930–2019.

By state

CategoryStates
Record highIllinois, Indiana, Kansas, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Jersey, Ohio, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Wisconsin
Much above normalArkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Missouri, New Hampshire, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia
Above normalAlabama, California, Georgia, Maine, Mississippi, Nevada, Utah
Below normalAlaska, Hawaii, Oregon
Much below normalWashington — the only one

Map of the United States with each state coloured by its 2019 streamflow rank: most of the middle and east in black and dark blue for record and much-above-normal flow, the Northwest in yellow and orange.

Figure 2. Statewide streamflow ranks for water year 2019.

Regions

The United States, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands are divided into 21 water-resources regions — large drainages based on the land surface: a major river's basin, several rivers together (the Texas-Gulf region, for example, holds several rivers draining to the Gulf of Mexico), or an island or island group.

Map of the 21 water-resources regions of the United States, numbered, from New England (1) to the Caribbean (21).

Figure 3. Water-resources regions.

CategoryRegions
Record highArkansas-White-Red, Great Lakes, Mid-Atlantic, Missouri, Ohio, Upper Mississippi
Much above normalLower Mississippi, New England, Tennessee, Texas-Gulf
Above normalCalifornia, Great Basin, Rio Grande, Souris-Red-Rainy, South Atlantic-Gulf
Below normalAlaska, Hawaii, Pacific Northwest

Map of water-resources regions coloured by 2019 streamflow rank, with a large black block of record flow across the Missouri, Upper Mississippi, Great Lakes, Ohio and Mid-Atlantic regions.

Figure 4. Regional streamflow ranks for water year 2019.

Season by season

Autumn (Oct–Dec 2018)Winter (Jan–Mar 2019)Spring (Apr–Jun 2019)Summer (Jul–Sep 2019)
National rank1st of 902nd2nd14th
Record highDistrict of Columbia, Iowa, Louisiana, Maryland, New Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Texas, Virginia, WisconsinIowa, Minnesota, Nebraska, South DakotaIllinois, Kansas, Michigan, South Dakota, WisconsinSouth Dakota
Much above normalAlabama, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New York, Ohio, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Vermont, West VirginiaArkansas, District of Columbia, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Missouri, New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee, Virginia, WisconsinArkansas, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Maine, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, New Hampshire, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Texas, VermontArkansas, Colorado, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Wisconsin
Above normalArkansas, Florida, Illinois, Mississippi, OklahomaAlabama, Arizona, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Massachusetts, Mississippi, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Texas, West VirginiaCalifornia, Connecticut, Delaware, Kentucky, Maryland, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oregon, Rhode Island, UtahCalifornia, Iowa, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Nevada, Ohio, Utah
Below normalCalifornia, Oregon, UtahIdaho, Oregon, Puerto Rico and the Virgin IslandsPuerto Rico and the Virgin IslandsAlabama, Georgia, Hawaii, South Carolina
Much below normalColoradoWashingtonHawaii, WashingtonAlaska, Arizona, Washington

Map of autumn 2018 streamflow ranks by state.

Figure 5. Autumn (October–December 2018) statewide ranks.

Map of winter 2019 streamflow ranks by state.

Figure 6. Winter (January–March 2019) statewide ranks.

Map of spring 2019 streamflow ranks by state.

Figure 7. Spring (April–June 2019) statewide ranks.

Map of summer 2019 streamflow ranks by state.

Figure 8. Summer (July–September 2019) statewide ranks.

High and low flows

If gauges were independent and flows normally distributed, in any month about 5 percent of gauges would be expected to run high (above their 95th percentile) and 5 percent low (below their 5th). In water year 2019, every month had more high-flow gauges than expected — and no month had more low-flow gauges than expected.

MonthOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSep
Gauges with high flow (%)1422181114810159767

Bar chart of the percentage of streamgages with high flow (above) and low flow (below) each month from October 1999 to September 2019, with dashed lines at 5 percent and high-flow bars towering at the start of water year 2019.

Figure 9. Percentage of streamgages with high and low monthly streamflow, October 1999–September 2019.

More information

In water year 2019 the USGS ran more than 8,400 year-round, real-time streamflow gauges, with data at waterwatch.usgs.gov and state runoff summaries back to water year 1901. The network, part of the Groundwater and Streamflow Information Program, is operated mainly by the USGS and funded by it and about 1,400 federal, state, tribal, regional and local partners. Its data serve water management, flood and drought monitoring, bridge design and recreation.

Sources

  • Jian, X., Wolock, D.M., Lins, H.F., and Brady, S.J., 2020, Streamflow—Water year 2019: U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2020–3057. https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/fs20203057
  • The figures, captions and photograph come from the fact sheet's PDF, which the web version lacks.
  • Rewritten in hubnx's own words.
LanguagesEnglish

Licence: CC0 1.0 (public domain) · Adapted from pubs.usgs.gov

1

0

0

0

Spinner Logo

Comments

Spinner Logo
Version: 2CC0 1.0 — public domain
The runaway star that left the Tarantula Nebula
Version: 2CC0 1.0 — public domain
The Blackwell School, where segregation had no law behind it
Version: 2CC0 1.0 — public domain
The Eagle Nebula, seen in the infrared
Version: 2CC0 1.0 — public domain
The house where the Equal Rights Amendment was written
Version: 2CC0 1.0 — public domain
The Aleutians, the forgotten front of the Second World War
Version: 2CC0 1.0 — public domain
The Cosmic Cliffs are not cliffs