Перейти к содержимому
Hub Nexus
АвторАвтора пока нетВзять себе

Есть что улучшить? Предложите правку.

Поддержка

Эта страница общедоступна.

A new technique uses critical flow theory to estimate river discharge from Google Earth images. The results accurately match on-the-ground measurements.

By Brooke Bauman, Carl Legleiter, and Christy Leonard

About this article

NPS arrowhead logo next to the words parkscience: a national park service magazine

This article was originally published in the "In Brief" section of Park Science magazine, Volume 39, Number 2, Summer 2025 (August 29, 2025).

Six people and a lot of gear in a big, blue raft in the midst of roiling river rapids. One is paddling as the others hold on to ropes in the front or back of the raft. The fast-moving water is the color of coffee with cream.

Boaters running Lava Falls rapid on the Colorado River in Grand Canyon National Park. Rapids like these could help scientists learn about river conditions without needing to visit in person. That helps keep them safe and supports things like flood planning. NPS / Mark Lellouch

Imagine you’re on a whitewater rafting trip on the Colorado River. Your guide has been talking up a section of the river with some huge standing waves. As you approach it, you get ready, anxiously awaiting the thrill.

And off you go! Water splashes over the raft as you navigate the rapids, following the directions that the guide yells out.

“Forward two!”

“Forward three!”

“Lean in!”

Then suddenly, you’re through and into calmer waters. Smiles all around.

Turns out those rapids aren’t just for fun. They could help scientists figure out what’s going on in remote rivers, far away from towns and cities. That’s important because those rivers may be the source of your drinking water. They may sustain critical habitat that supports recreational fishing. Or they may cause problems for downstream communities when there’s too much rain or too little. Land management agencies like the National Park Service often need to know how much water is in a river, even if it’s far away or hard to get to.

Getting this information requires measuring river discharge. That’s the volume of water flowing in a river over a certain amount of time. But river discharge isn’t always easy to measure, especially for remote rivers that are difficult to access. This causes data gaps that could have real-world consequences during floods or drought. A study published in Geophysical Research Letters in May 2025 shows that Google Earth images of rapids may help scientists and resource managers measure discharge in some distant rivers without leaving the office.

Measuring River Discharge

The standard way to measure river discharge is to establish gaging stations. These are locations along a river where a sensor measures changes in water level over time. Trained technicians will visit the stations to record flow depth and velocity at multiple positions across the channel. This requires a substantial investment in labor, time, and money and can be dangerous for people and equipment.

"Swift currents and deep water make wading unsafe and can make it difficult to install flow gauges.”

Challenges like these have prompted river stewards to explore remote methods of measuring river discharge. Previously tested remote methods used satellite images and data from manned and unmanned aircraft. They proved best suited to relatively shallow, clear-flowing rivers. Optical images obtained by helicopter were effective for measuring flow velocities in sediment-laden rivers. But they often required extra steps for clearer waters.

Getting data through aircraft or satellites can also be expensive and unreliable. Images may be obscured by cloud cover or other weather effects. To overcome these challenges, the study authors devised a new technique. It uses measurements taken from Google Earth images, which are freely available and screened for cloud cover.

Rivers with relatively steep slopes or constricted channels typically have what scientists call “critical flow.” Under these conditions, the speed of a wave moving upstream is equal but opposite to the speed of the water flowing downstream. This makes the waves appear to stand still. Scientists call the resulting regularly spaced standing waves “undular hydraulic jumps” (UHJs). The whitewater rafting community calls them “wave trains.”

GIF of a wave on a river, continually cresting and breaking in the same spot.

Wave trains—also known as undular hydraulic jumps—can form in rivers with steep slopes or narrow channels. This slow-motion animation, from a video of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon National Park, shows the phenomenon in action. It is for demonstration purposes only and was not part of the published study. NPS / Nolan Wang

Based on critical flow theory, if a river has critical flow, you can calculate its discharge by measuring the wavelength of the UHJs and the width of the river channel. The researchers analyzed 82 Google Earth images of rivers with UHJs that met the conditions for critical flow. They measured the UHJ wavelength and width of the rivers in the images. Then they used those measurements to calculate river discharge. They found that river discharges derived from these images agreed closely with on-the-ground stream gage measurements.

Broader Applicability Than at First Glance

One limitation of this method is that the UHJs must be clearly visible in the images. This occurs most often in rivers on slopes greater than 0.01 (those that drop by more than a foot for every 100 feet along the channel). To assess the potential applicability of this method, the researchers evaluated a few river datasets. When they analyzed data from 8,453 active stream gages in the USGS National Water Information System, they found that 12 percent of the rivers had slopes greater than 0.01.

The average slope of the Colorado River through the Grand Canyon is as little as 0.0015. That’s 85 percent less steep than 0.01. But there are UHJs in steeper sections of the river.

The USGS National Hydrographic Dataset has measurements for over 2.6 million stream reaches (stream sections with similar conditions). The study authors found that over 40 percent of these had slopes greater than 0.01. Some rivers with overall slopes less than 0.01 may also have UHJs. The average slope of the Colorado River through the Grand Canyon is as little as 0.0015. That’s 85 percent less steep than 0.01. But there are UHJs in steeper sections of the river, where slopes are 0.02 to 0.03.

Cost Effective and Less Risky

Rivers where critical flow occurs often aren’t included in stream gage networks. The authors argue that this method could help fill those knowledge gaps. They also make the case that this method is cost effective and reduces risks to staff and equipment. It uses publicly available images and requires no additional data collection. The tools for measuring UHJ wavelength and channel width on Google Earth images can be found in free software. And it doesn’t require investing in special gear or traveling to remote locations. You can save that for your next epic whitewater rafting trip.

About the authors

Cite this article

Bauman, Brooke, Carl Legleiter, and Christy Leonard. 2025. “New Research: Images of Rapids Can Help Measure River Flow.” Park Science 39 (2). August 29, 2025. https://www.nps.gov/articles/000/psv39n2_new-research-images-of-rapids-can-help-measure-river-flow.htm

Where this belongs

  • Grand Canyon National Park

Where this page came from

This page was imported from National Park Service. Produced by the U.S. National Park Service and, as a work of the United States government, in the public domain.

Nobody has written it yet — it is the source material at a new address, which is why search engines are asked to skip it and why no one earns from it. It is up for grabs: take it on, and it is yours to rewrite and to earn from.

В изданияхGrand Canyon National Park

ЯзыкиEnglish

Лицензия: CC0 1.0 (общественное достояние) · По материалам www.nps.gov

Взгляды

Комментарии

Spinner Logo
Версия: 2CC0 1.0 (общественное достояние)
The runaway star that left the Tarantula Nebula
Версия: 2CC0 1.0 (общественное достояние)
The Eagle Nebula, seen in the infrared
Версия: 2CC0 1.0 (общественное достояние)
The Cosmic Cliffs are not cliffs
Версия: 2CC0 1.0 (общественное достояние)
The recommended targets are real, but the largest health gain is between doing nothing and doing a little. That is the part worth knowing if you are starting from nothing.
Версия: 2CC0 1.0 (общественное достояние)
Sleep is not one state but a cycle through several, each doing different work. Most sleep disorders are a failure to complete that cycle rather than a shortage of hours.
Версия: 2CC0 1.0 (общественное достояние)
Four nebulae that revealed the shape of our galaxy