Hub Nexus
Uppdaterad

FörfattareIngen författare änTa över den

Ser du något att förbättra? Föreslå en ändring.

Stöd

For five months of the year, temperatures in South Sudan’s capital, Juba, climb above 35 degrees Celsius. These temperatures are punishing for anyone, but particularly here, where air conditioning cannot offer any relief.

While people in richer parts of the world can switch on their ACs, for billions in energy-poor countries, there is little electricity available to power a fan or an air conditioner.

We can see this by comparing how much electricity people use at home on a typical day with how much power an air conditioner requires.1] Let’s consider a typical single-room air conditioner that [uses around 1,000 watt-hours of electricity in an hour.[2]

Inefficient models can use 1,500 watt-hours of electricity per hour — 50% more than a typical air conditioner. That’s why efficient AC units are even more important for those in energy poverty.

In at least 45 countries, the *average *residential electricity use per person for an entire day is less than the electricity that is required to power an air conditioner for one hour.[3] In the chart, I’ve shown how long the average person could run an air conditioner for across a selection of these countries.

In India, the daily electricity budget is sufficient for only 44 minutes of AC. In Nigeria, just 13 minutes; and in South Sudan, just 4.[4]

Energy poverty: How long could the average person run an air conditioner every day? Horizontal bar chart showing how many minutes a typical 1000W single-room air conditioner could be powered by the average per capita residential electricity use in various countries. Values by country: India 44 minutes; Sri Lanka 39 minutes; Pakistan 37 minutes; Zimbabwe 25 minutes; Nigeria 13 minutes; Kenya 10 minutes; Haiti 8 minutes; South Sudan 4 minutes; Rwanda 3 minutes; Chad 1 minute. Key insight: large disparities in residential electricity access, with even the highest-listed country able to run a 1000W air conditioner less than one hour per day. Footer data source text: Data source: Calculated based on International Energy Agency and UN World Population Prospects.

As a consequence, most people in some of the world’s hottest countries do not use AC. The most recent data from the International Energy Agency suggests that just 5% of households in India, 6% in South Africa, and 16% in Brazil had air conditioning.[5] In the very poorest countries, almost no one has it.

What alternatives do they have? Maybe an electric fan?

Even a basic one is out of reach for many.

An electric fan uses around 50 watt-hours of electricity per hour. The chart below shows how long the average person could run one for across another set of countries.

The average Nigerian could run a fan for around 4 hours (although they would have no other power to spare for lighting, phone charging, or cooking). The average in Haiti is about 2.5 hours. But in the world’s most energy-poor countries, the average person cannot switch on a fan for even just an hour.

Extreme heat makes it harder to sleep, learn, and work. It raises the risk of both acute and chronic illnesses, including heart disease, stroke, and kidney disease. Because the heat impacts people’s productivity, it traps people in poverty.[6]

Energy poverty: How long could the average person run an electric fan every day? Horizontal bar chart showing how many minutes or hours a standard 50 watt electric fan could be powered each day by the average per-capita residential electricity use in selected countries, bars sorted from longest to shortest. - Nigeria: 4 hours 12 minutes - Yemen: 3 hours 55 minutes - Kenya: 3 hours 23 minutes - Ethiopia: 3 hours 7 minutes - Haiti: 2 hours 38 minutes - South Sudan: 1 hour 10 minutes - Uganda: 1 hour 6 minutes - DR Congo: 55 minutes - Chad: 18 minutes Data source noted in the chart footer: calculated based on the International Energy Agency and UN World Population Prospects.

In colder countries, we wouldn’t accept people freezing in their homes. The opposite is also true: we shouldn’t accept people working and living in oppressive heat without ways to cool themselves down.

Air conditioning can be a truly life-saving solution for some people and make life much less miserable for billions. If they are to become available for billions, the world needs more and cheaper power and an end to global poverty.

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to Max Roser and Edouard Mathieu for editorial feedback and comments on this article.

Endnotes

1] To calculate daily residential electricity consumption per person, I’ve used electricity consumption data from the [International Energy Agency (IEA). It gives an estimate of residential electricity used annually for each country. By dividing by population, we get an estimate of the average use per person (and then dividing by 365 gives us the daily value). Note that underneath this average, there can be very large inequalities, with many people having no electricity at all, and those that do, consuming much more than this average value. Without more data on the complete distribution of consumption, this still gives us some insight into the depth of energy poverty in many countries.

[2] This varies depending on the efficiency of the AC unit and local conditions such as humidity. In very humid conditions, air conditioners are less efficient and often use more electricity. In drier climates, they likely use less. A plausible range is anywhere from 600 to over 1,600 watt-hours. In these calculations, I’ve used 1000 watt-hours everywhere for consistency.

[3] I say “at least 45 countries” here because a number of low-income countries do not have data, and are likely to be well below the 1,000 Wh threshold.

[4] Many people live with family or friends, so they might be able to share this electricity “budget”. But electricity is also needed for other things: lights, phone charging, a refrigerator, a television, or an oven. Even in a household with two or three people, running an AC unit for even a few hours a day would be far greater than their current electricity consumption for the day.

[5] This latest data is for the year 2018. Rates are likely to have increased slightly since then, but probably not more than a few percentage points.

[6] Park, R. J., Goodman, J., Hurwitz, M., & Smith, J. (2020). Heat and learning. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy. Obradovich, N., Migliorini, R., Mednick, S. C., & Fowler, J. H. (2017). Nighttime temperature and human sleep loss in a changing climate. Science advances. Minor, K., Bjerre-Nielsen, A., Jonasdottir, S. S., Lehmann, S., & Obradovich, N. (2022). Rising temperatures erode human sleep globally. One Earth.

Where this page came from

This page was imported from Our World in Data. “Four minutes of air conditioning” by Hannah Ritchie, published by Our World in Data under CC BY 4.0. Changed here: set as a page, its interactive charts shown as pictures. Data from third parties keeps its own licence.

Nobody has written it yet — it is the source material at a new address, which is why search engines are asked to skip it and why no one earns from it. It is up for grabs: take it on, and it is yours to rewrite and to earn from.

SpråkEnglish

Licens: CC BY 4.0 · Bearbetat efter ourworldindata.org

1

0

0

0

Spinner Logo

Kommentarer

Spinner Logo
Version: 2CC0 1.0 — public domain
The runaway star that left the Tarantula Nebula
Version: 2CC0 1.0 — public domain
The Blackwell School, where segregation had no law behind it
Version: 2CC0 1.0 — public domain
The Eagle Nebula, seen in the infrared
Version: 2CC0 1.0 — public domain
The house where the Equal Rights Amendment was written
Version: 2CC0 1.0 — public domain
The Aleutians, the forgotten front of the Second World War
Version: 2CC0 1.0 — public domain
The Cosmic Cliffs are not cliffs