Notes from the Field : Impact of a Mass Drug Administration Campaign Using a Novel Three-Drug Regimen on Lymphatic Filariasis Antigenemia — American Samoa, 2019

Marisa A. Hast, PhD1,2; Aifili Tufa, PhD3; Tara A. Brant, MSc2; Lynette Suiaunoa-Scanlan, MPH4; Janet Camacho, MPH, MSN4; June Vaifanua-Leo, MD3; Keri Robinson, MPH2; Emily Dodd, MPH2; Ben Sili3; Loretta S. Lees3; Kimberly Y. Won, PhD2; Fara Utu3 (

Related Materials

• PDF [86K]

Lymphatic filariasis is a debilitating and disfiguring mosquitoborne parasitic disease. As part of the Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends at least five rounds of annual mass drug administration (MDA) in areas with endemic disease to reduce incidence and prevalence (1). Onward transmission is expected to end once community prevalence falls below 1% (1).

American Samoa, located in the southern Pacific Ocean, is the only U.S. territory with evidence of ongoing lymphatic filariasis transmission. After 7 years of MDA (2000–2006), the prevalence of lymphatic filariasis antigenemia in American Samoa declined from 16.5% to 2.3%, and MDA was stopped (2,3). In 2016, a household survey among 2,507 participants revealed that the prevalence of antigenemia had rebounded to 6.2%, and transmission was ascertained to be widespread across the territory (4). MDA was resumed in 2018 using a novel three-drug regimen of ivermectin, diethylcarbamazine, and albendazole, which has been shown to more effectively clear filarial larvae from the blood than the standard two-drug treatment of albendazole with diethylcarbamazine or ivermectin alone (5,6). This WHO-recommended three-drug regimen is anticipated to accelerate progress toward global elimination goals in areas without other filarial infections that would contraindicate the use of diethylcarbamazine (onchocerciasis) or ivermectin (loiasis).

During July 11–August 17, 2019, the American Samoa Department of Health (ASDOH) conducted a survey in collaboration with CDC and the Pacific Island Health Officers’ Association* to determine the effect of three-drug MDA on lymphatic filariasis prevalence in American Samoa. Households were selected from all 68 villages on the main islands of Tutuila and Aunu’u using systematic random sampling. Children aged 5–9 years and villages previously known to have high transmission rates were oversampled. Eligible household members aged ≥5 years with provision of informed consent were administered a questionnaire and provided a blood specimen for lymphatic filariasis antigen testing using the Alere filariasis test strip (Abbott). All participants who received antigen-positive test results were offered treatment.

ASDOH visited 1,865 households and enrolled 2,081 persons in the survey. A total of 47 participants with a positive antigen test for lymphatic filariasis were identified. Cases were geographically dispersed; however, a large proportion of cases were found along the western coast of Tutuila. By age, the antigen test positivity rate was 1.1% among children aged 5–9 years and 2.9% among household members aged ≥10 years. After adjusting for age and location, the overall prevalence of lymphatic filariasis antigenemia in American Samoa was estimated to be 2.7%. Adjusted prevalence of antigenemia was higher among males (4.8%) than among females (1.0%) (p<0.001), and this pattern was consistent across age groups (

These results indicate that lymphatic filariasis antigenemia has declined since 2016 but remains above the 1% WHO threshold in all age groups, suggesting that lymphatic filariasis transmission in American Samoa is ongoing. To interrupt transmission in this setting, American Samoa should consider following WHO recommendations (5) and continue annual three-drug MDA with appropriate monitoring of progress toward elimination until targets are met. Lymphatic filariasis control activities should target high-prevalence sectors of the population, including adult men, to ensure that this population is adequately covered in the future.

Corresponding author: Marisa A. Hast, mhast@cdc.gov, 404-718-1109.

1Epidemic Intelligence Service, CDC; 2Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, CDC; 3American Samoa Department of Health; 4Pacific Island Health Officers’ Association, American Samoa.

All authors have completed and submitted the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

• https://www.pihoa.org/.

References

• World Health Organization. Global programme to eliminate lymphatic filariasis: progress report, 2018. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 2019;94:457–72. https://www.who.int/publications-detail/who-wer9441-457-472.
• World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific. The PacELF way: towards the elimination of lymphatic filariasis from the Pacific, 1999–2005. Manila, Philippines: World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific; 2006. https://iris.wpro.who.int/handle/10665.1/10966
• Coutts SP, King JD, Pa’au M, et al. Prevalence and risk factors associated with lymphatic filariasis in American Samoa after mass drug administration. Trop Med Health 2017;45:22. CrossRef PubMed
• Sheel M, Sheridan S, Gass K, et al. Identifying residual transmission of lymphatic filariasis after mass drug administration: comparing school-based versus community-based surveillance—American Samoa, 2016. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2018;12:e0006583. CrossRef PubMed
• World Health Organization. Guideline: alternative mass drug administration regimens to eliminate lymphatic filariasis. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2017. https://www.who.int/publications-detail/9789241550161
• Thomsen EK, Sanuku N, Baea M, et al. Efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of coadministered diethylcarbamazine, albendazole, and ivermectin for treatment of bancroftian filariasis. Clin Infect Dis 2016;62:334–41. CrossRef PubMed

###

• Ivermectin, diethylcarbamazine, and albendazole.

Where this page came from

This page was imported from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Material produced by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is a work of the United States government and is in the public domain.

Nobody has written it yet — it is the source material at a new address, which is why search engines are asked to skip it and why no one earns from it. It is up for grabs: take it on, and it is yours to rewrite and to earn from.