Northern Great Plains Annual Brome Adaptive Management Project

Over the past twenty years, since approximately the turn of the 21st century, two introduced Eurasion annual brome grass species, cheatgrass and Japanese brome, have become abundant in the Northern Great Plains (NGP). These species have the potential to increase the frequency that fire burns on the landscape and reduce native plant communities. Although the NGP mixed-grass prairie has adapted to frequent fires, invasion by these annual brome grasses has reduced native plant diversity and abundance in National Park Service (NPS) units in this area.

Seven NPS units within the ABAM consortium: Wind Cave and Badlands national parks, South Dakota; Agate Fossil Beds and Scotts Bluff national monuments, Nebraska; Devils Tower National Monument and Fort Laramie National Historic Site, Wyoming; and Little Bighorn Battlefield National Monument, Montana

Fire effects monitoring data collected by the fire ecology program (NGPFire) for the past twenty years has shown limited effectiveness of prescribed fires alone on fighting non-native annual bromes. Prescribed fire generally reduces the abundance of cheatgrass and Japanese brome the first year or two after fire, but then the annual brome abundance returns to or exceeds pre-fire levels soon thereafter. Management and restoration of high quality, mixed-grass prairie to the NPS units has proved difficult and complex.

A fire effects monitoring plot within the South Bluff unit at Scotts Bluff National Monument prior to the unit 2016 prescribed fire shows an abundance of cheatgrass. NPS

The Annual Brome Adaptive Management project (ABAM) is attacking this problem through a cooperative effort between NGPFire, the Rocky Mountain Inventory and Monitoring Networks (I&M), the Northern Rocky Mountain Exotic Plant Management Teams (EPMT), the fire management office for NGP, the USGS Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center, and seven national park units.

ABAM has developed a structured adaptive management framework with three main objectives; reduce annual brome abundance within consortium parks; improve native vegetation conditions (native diversity and abundance) in the parks; and minimize management treatment costs.

Hand ignition along the burn perimeter at Agate Fossil Beds N.M. during the Carnegie prescribed fire, October 2019. NPS

A predictive model using twenty years of monitoring data recommends the most efficient and cost-effective management action for a management unit looking five years into the future. Management treatment options include prescribed fire as well as application of two herbicides. The model assesses the timing of the treatment options, as well as whether a better outcome is achieved using them independently or in concert with each other. Any time new prescribed fire or herbicide treatments are implemented to the units, subsequent monitoring data will be input into the model, which will affect the predicted vegetation conditions and desired management options.

Each year, after the model has incorporated the latest vegetation monitoring data, members from the team will assist and advise parks regarding future treatment options, taking into consideration the model outputs. This multi-faceted management approach gives the NPS the best chance to restore the mixed-grass prairie plant communities to high quality conditions.

Part of a series of articles titled
Prairie Ecology of the Badlands.

Previous:
Plant Community Monitoring at Badlands National Park

Next:
A Sod Story: Ancient Prairies of the Badlands

Where this belongs

• Agate Fossil Beds National Monument
• Badlands National Park
• Devils Tower National Monument
• Fort Laramie National Historic Site
• Little Bighorn Battlefield National Monument
• Scotts Bluff National Monument

Where this page came from

This page was imported from National Park Service. Produced by the U.S. National Park Service and, as a work of the United States government, in the public domain.

Nobody has written it yet — it is the source material at a new address, which is why search engines are asked to skip it and why no one earns from it. It is up for grabs: take it on, and it is yours to rewrite and to earn from.