Hub Nexus
Updated

AuthorNo author yetClaim it

See something to improve? Propose a change.

Support

Map of California showing the change in April 1 snowpack between 1951–1980 and 1981–2010: losses in orange and yellow across most of the Sierra Nevada and northern mountains, small gains in green and blue at high elevations

Change in snowpack (snow water equivalent) in California between 1951–1980 and 1981–2010. The losses mirror worldwide trends everywhere but the highest elevations. USGS.

The problem

Rising air temperatures are changing water supplies worldwide: precipitation timing is shifting, snowpack is shrinking and snowmelt is coming earlier. Landscapes, plants, animals and farms feel it through longer dry seasons (which also raise demand for water), more extreme storms, fewer chilling hours for fruit trees, and higher snowlines.

Managers planning for the future have mostly relied on global climate model projections of temperature and precipitation — too coarse for regional and local decisions. The USGS has developed tools that combine climate data with detailed local environmental data to show how watersheds and landscapes will respond.

What managers need:

  • Recharge and runoff — how much water, when, and how extreme.
  • Climatic water deficit — how much water plants would use if it were available: a measure of irrigation demand and landscape stress.
  • Where these processes happen across a watershed, for planning and infrastructure.

Map of California's runoff from 1981 to 2010, highest in dark blue and green along the northern coast ranges and the Sierra Nevada, lowest in orange across the Central Valley and the south

Runoff in California, 1981–2010, estimated with the Basin Characterization Model. USGS.

The Basin Characterization Model

The BCM calculates the water entering and leaving a landscape, usually monthly across large regions (daily models exist for small watersheds). The land is divided into grid cells, and each cell's water balance is solved from its climate inputs:

  • Potential evapotranspiration, from solar radiation with topographic shading and cloud cover.
  • Snow, as it accumulates and melts.
  • Water moving through the soil, which gives actual evapotranspiration and the climatic water deficit (potential minus actual evapotranspiration).
  • Depending on the soil and how permeable the bedrock is, surplus water becomes recharge or runoff.

Results can be added up for any watershed or region — baseflow, streamflow and recharge to groundwater — or mapped across the landscape.

Flow diagram of the Basin Characterization Model: precipitation, air temperature and solar radiation feed snow processes and potential evapotranspiration; water available to the watershed moves through the soil profile, split into actual evapotranspiration, climatic water deficit, local recharge and local runoff, which feed basin discharge and groundwater recharge

How the model moves water through the soil and into bedrock to become recharge or runoff. USGS.

Downscaling

Global climate projections for the 21st century are downscaled to 270-meter cells. At that scale the model captures what really governs the water balance — energy loads and topographic shading — and can use maps of soils, vegetation and land use.

Two maps of projected maximum June air temperature in 2035: a coarse 12-kilometer grid and a detailed 270-meter version of the same area showing valleys and ridges

Downscaling a global climate projection from 12 kilometers to 270 meters. USGS.

Calibration: why trust it?

The model is calibrated — tuned to match observations — at basins across the western United States. It first reproduces unimpaired flow in unregulated upstream tributaries, such as Upper Dry Creek in the Russian River basin; then diversions and agricultural demand are added to match impaired flow downstream, as at the Guerneville gage. A final daily calibration for the Russian River at Hopland gives confidence in projecting streamflow into the future.

Upper panel: diagram of Russian River basin flows from Upper Dry Creek to Guerneville, with diversions, agricultural uses and a reservoir. Lower panel: graph of observed and model-estimated daily flow at Hopland from 1997 to 2008, closely matching

Calibration in the Russian River basin: (A) flows considered, (B) observed and modeled flow at Hopland. USGS.

How climate change affects water

Timing and amount. Air temperature controls when snow melts, and melt has been earlier in recent years. Whatever the total precipitation, less will fall as snow, and snowpack will not carry water supply as far into the dry season.

Graph of projected April 1 snowpack in the Indian Creek basin through the 21st century under two climate projections, declining toward zero in later decades

Projected April 1 snowpack, Indian Creek basin, through the 21st century. USGS.

Map of the Klamath River basin shaded by projected change in recharge under one climate projection, with decreases in red and orange in the east and increases in green and blue in parts of the west

Projected change in recharge across the Klamath River basin. USGS.

Extremes. Atmospheric rivers bringing big winter storms, and long droughts, lead to flooding, poorer water quality, harm to agriculture and threats to fisheries.

Snow-streaked granite mountains rising above a dark conifer forest under a blue sky with clouds

Photograph by L.E. Flint, USGS.

Infrastructure

Reservoirs, canals and pumps were built around each watershed's dominant hydrologic process. As climate shifts the timing of rain and snowmelt, together with soil depth, it changes how much water recharges groundwater rather than running off:

  • With less snow and deep soils, recharge can rise during a compressed wet season and the longer dry season.
  • With shallow soils, higher peak flows can increase runoff.

The Russian, Tuolumne, Merced and American basins all depend on reservoirs to carry water through the dry season. The American is projected to gain recharge relative to runoff; the Russian, Tuolumne and Merced could lose recharge — changes that could affect reservoir operations and justify changes in groundwater-storage management.

Four maps of the Russian, Tuolumne, Merced and American river basins shaded by projected change in the ratio of recharge to runoff, with red and orange for decreases and green and blue for increases

Projected change in the ratio of recharge to runoff, 1981–2010 to 2071–2100, under one climate projection. USGS.

Landscapes, vegetation and farms

The climatic water deficit — the yearly evaporative demand that exceeds available water — combines climate, energy, drainage and soil moisture in one number. It closely tracks where vegetation grows, and it indicates irrigation demand. Because soils can only store so much of the wet season's rain, the deficit by summer's end rises under every climate scenario — even wetter ones.

Two maps of climatic water deficit: San Francisco Bay area watersheds, where it varies with distance from the coast, slope direction and soil depth; and Brazil's Atlantic Forest, projected for 2080, varying from north to south

Climatic water deficit in (A) San Francisco Bay area watersheds and (B) Brazil's Atlantic Forest, projected for 2080. USGS.

Where it has been used

  • Local: Russian River basin (water management and climate change); San Diego watershed (groundwater); Modoc National Wildlife Refuge (water and landscape stress).
  • Regional: the Sierra Nevada (wolverine habitat and snowmelt); the western U.S. (links between forest die-off, wildfire severity and water deficit); the Great Basin and Upper Colorado River basins (stress on threatened species, recharge).
  • International: the Tigris–Euphrates basin in Iraq; Brazil's Atlantic Forest; small coffee farms in Central America.

It can help prioritize management, map landscape stress or irrigation demand now and in future climates, and find where species may shift and where climatic and hydrologic refuges may lie.

In short

The BCM uses detailed maps of soils, geology and topography with monthly or daily climate to map recharge, runoff, snowpack, evapotranspiration and water deficit from hillslope to region. Calibrated with historical climate and streamflow, it turns climate projections into local hydrologic effects. It models natural (unimpaired) conditions, but can add demands, diversions and reservoir releases, and can feed groundwater-flow models such as MODFLOW and integrated models such as MF-FMP.

Data: the California BCM is available from the California Climate Commons.

Sources

Based on Lorraine E. Flint, Alan L. Flint and James H. Thorne, "Climate change: evaluating your local and regional water resources," U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2014–3098; a work of the United States government in the public domain. The maps, diagrams, graphs and the author's photograph are taken from the fact sheet's PDF; a landscape photograph credited to S.B. Weiss is not reproduced.

LanguagesEnglish

Licence: CC0 1.0 (public domain) · Adapted from pubs.usgs.gov

1

0

0

0

Spinner Logo

Comments

Spinner Logo
Version: 2CC0 1.0 — public domain
The runaway star that left the Tarantula Nebula
Version: 2CC0 1.0 — public domain
The Blackwell School, where segregation had no law behind it
Version: 2CC0 1.0 — public domain
The Eagle Nebula, seen in the infrared
Version: 2CC0 1.0 — public domain
The house where the Equal Rights Amendment was written
Version: 2CC0 1.0 — public domain
The Aleutians, the forgotten front of the Second World War
Version: 2CC0 1.0 — public domain
The Cosmic Cliffs are not cliffs