Skip to content
Hub Nexus

No author yetClaim it

Version 1Updated 9 min read

Support

This is a critique of "Benefits of skeletal-muscle exercise training in pulmonary arterial hypertension: The WHOLEi + 12 trial".[1] A study completed by González-Saiz, L., Fiuza-Luces, C., Sanchis-Gomar, F., Santos-Lozano, A., Quezada-Loaiza, C. A., Flox-Camacho, A., Munguía-Izquierdo, D., Ara, I., Santalla, A., Morán, M., Sanz-Ayan, P., Escribano-Subías, P., and Lucia, A., published in the International Journal of Cardiology in 2017.[1]

What is the background to this research?

This study explored whether, over the course of eight weeks, patients diagnosed with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), or inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), could improve muscle power, physical activity and other variables through resistance, inspiratory and aerobic training.[1]

PAH is a progressive, fatal condition acquired genetically, or secondary to conditions such as HIV, connective tissue disorders, or CTEPH.[1][2][3][4] It causes symptoms such as being short of breath, dizziness, and muscle weakness, ultimately leading to right ventricular (RV) failure.[1][2] PAH significantly restricts exercise capability due to the aforementioned symptoms, and from limited blood oxygen availability due to progressive RV remodelling.[1][5]

CTEPH occurs with chronic pulmonary artery obstruction, displaying similar symptoms and effects on exercise capability to PAH, however, can be cured surgically.[6]

PAH treatment aims to improve life quality through medication or surgery.[2][3] This has helped increase survival rates; however, PAH still has a one-year survival rate of 85%[3] and seven-year survival of 49%,[3] with certain types still untreatable.[3][7] New therapies are required to find a cure for this severely life-limiting disease.[3]

This study sought to close research gaps by using the combination of exercise aforementioned, the use of heavier weight training, and use of a shorter time period.[1]

Where is the research from?

The study was completed in Madrid, Spain, at the Hospital 12 de Octubre, where six of the authors conduct research through the hospital's i+12 Research Institute, which was established in 2009.[1][8]

At least 10 of the 13 authors completed prior research in PAH, CTEPH or other cardiac conditions, including two medical doctors practicing within the hospital's Pulmonary Hypertension Unit. The authors have nearly all completed prior research exploring the effects of various types of physical activity and exercise on PAH, CTEPH and other cardiac conditions.

Inclusion criteria included:[1]

No conflicts of interest were stated, however, POWERbreathe9] supplied devices for inspiratory training. POWERbreathe[9] sells inspiratory training devices to medical professionals and the public, making claims their product can [lower blood pressure and is beneficial to athletes.[9] It could be argued that this company has a vested interest in supporting inspiratory training research, as this may increase their sales. Funding was provided by Real Madrid Graduate School-Universidad Europea[1] which, as an exclusively sports focused graduate university,[10][11] may be more likely to provide funding for exercise based research.

What kind of research was this?

This study was a randomised controlled trial (RCT), where only researchers determining eligibility and results were blinded to the groups.

The placebo group continued to receive their normal course of treatment.

Other studies show similar evidence in regards to the outcomes of exercise in PAH patients among comparable results such as peak oxygen uptake, Six-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD) and aerobic threshold.[12][13][14]

What did the research involve?

Over an eight-week period a total of 40 participants participated.

20 participants completed:

  • aerobic exercise five times per week
  • resistance exercise three times per week
  • inspiratory muscle training twice daily, six times per week.

All sessions were completed at the hospital under supervision with one trainer to one participant, apart from the second daily session of inspiratory training which was completed at home.

The remaining 20 participants completed their normal treatment.

When designed well, RCT's are the gold standard when investigating new treatment methods.[15] The researchers also made data corrections to reduce possibility of statistical type I error.

However, limitations include:

  • Training load – Participants completed 20 sessions per week for eight weeks, near entirely supervised. Therefore, results could not be generalised to populations unsupervised or at lower workloads.
  • Selection criteria – Participants were excluded if living outside of Madrid, or if not a current hospital patient. Results cannot be generalised to patients outside of these areas.
  • Group allocation – Control group displayed several baseline measures higher than the intervention group. The researchers do not state how groups were randomised, if this was done poorly, results may be due to factors other than those manipulated.[15]
  • Small sample size – Larger sample sizes may yield different results.
  • Stage of disease – Exercise and control groups contained 80% and 90% participants in class I - II, respectively. Results cannot be generalised to more severe patients.
  • CTEPH participants – With only two, this could not provide meaningful results for this population.
  • Study design – RCT's are highly controlled, and not always accurate in the real world.[15]

What were the basic results?

Findings included:[1]

  • Muscle power and strength – Exercise group increased, control relatively stable
  • VO2peak – Exercise group increased, slight decrease in control
  • Safety – No significant health or safety events during exercise
  • Moderate-vigorous physical activity minutes per day – Both groups decreased
  • Minutes inactive per day – Exercise group increased, control decreased

The researchers reinforced improved muscle strength, power, VO2peak , and safety.[1] They acknowledged limitations, including that some physicality tests (such as 6MWD) may have been too simple to elicit results from healthier participants, and that they did not investigate haemodynamics.[1]

They failed to discuss the decreased amount and intensity of daily physical activity that occurred.

What conclusions can we take from this research?

The combination of exercise appeared to significantly increase VO2peak and muscle strength, particularly lower body, and demonstrated safety of exercise in PAH and inoperable CTEPH patients. Importantly, most participants were in earlier stages of disease, with less affected baseline VO2peak and exercise ability. Points to consider if implementing this advice in real world settings, includes the detrimental effect to inactivity and intensity of physical activity, which warrants further exploration, no significant change in several physical activity variables, and the level of supervision, participant workload and time required.

Numerous other studies, both prior to and after the study, also resoundingly support various combinations of resistance,[16][17] aerobic[16][18][19] and inspiratory[16][14][20] training as beneficial and safe for PAH patients.[13][18] Moderate intensity[16][18] exercise appears to have gained most support, however, there is still no consensus on ideal type, duration, intensity, and amount of supervision to provide best patient outcomes.[12][20][21] There also seems to be some questions as to exactly how exercise benefits PAH patients, which requires further research.[20][21]

Practical advice

Exercise appears a beneficial and safe addition to existing treatment in PAH patients, as supported by this study and others.[1][16][18] Heavier resistance exercise may be beneficial in re-building muscle strength in higher functioning sufferers,[1] however no exercise guidelines currently exist for this population.[12][20][21]

With these considerations, completing any exercise will provide more benefits than no exercise, along with improving quality of life.[12][16]

The patient should consult with their medical team before commencing a new exercise program,[22] and all exercise programming and supervision should be completed by an appropriately qualified exercise professional.

Further information/resources

References

'****

Where this page came from

This page was imported from Wikibooks. From “Exercise as it relates to Disease” on Wikibooks, by its contributors, under CC BY-SA 4.0. Changed here: set as a page; navigation and edit links left out; each image under its own licence, credited in its caption.

Nobody has written it yet — it is the source material at a new address, which is why search engines are asked to skip it and why no one earns from it. It is up for grabs: take it on, and it is yours to rewrite and to earn from.

Comments

Spinner Logo

Next in Exercise as it relates to Disease

CC BY-SA 4.0
This is a critique of Jeng-Shing Wang and Wen-Ping Hung's (2009) article [The effects of a swimming intervention for children with asthma]( for the purpose of a 'Wiki Assessment' in Semester 2, 2021 at the University of Canberra for the unit; Health, Disease and Exercise. ## Background Research Asth
CC BY-SA 4.0
This is a critique of the article; Effects of Combined Aerobic-Strength Training vs Fitness Education Program in COPD Patients. ## **What is the Background to this research?** This study was designed to compare the effects that a new physical activity education program approach also known as (EDU) [
CC BY-SA 4.0
This is a critique of the article by Wolfgang Gruber, David Orenstein, Klaus Braumann and Ralph Beneke; Interval exercise training in Cystic Fibrosis - effects on exercise capacity in severely affected adults, from the Journal of Cystic Fibrosis[1]. This is written for assessment in the Health, Dise
CC BY-SA 4.0
This Wikibooks page is a critical appraisal of the journal article "Feasibility of exercising adults with asthma: a randomized pilot study" by Boyd et al. (2012).[1] ## What is the background to this research? Asthma is a chronic disorder of the airways that causes excessive inflammation in response
CC BY-SA 4.0
Common allergens that can trigger or aggravate asthma attacks include grass, pollen, animal fur, dust and certain food and drugs. Anxiety, stress, strenuous exercise (exacerbated by cold weather) and respiratory infections are among the most common variables [2]. The diagnosis of asthma during child