Skip to content
Hub Nexus

No author yetClaim it

Version 1Updated 7 min read

Support

This page is a critique on research article The impact of physical activity during pregnancy on maternal weight and obstetric outcomes. Mizgier M, Mruczyk K, Jarząbek-Bielecka G, Jeszka J.Ginekologia polska[1].

What is the background to this research?

Regular physical activity in all phases of life, including pregnancy, promotes health benefits for the mother and reduces the risk of complications related to foetal development and chronic diseases in children later in life.[1] However, the majority of the woman of childbearing age are overweight or obese. Inactivity in pregnancy and excessive weight gain have been recognised as an independent probability for maternal obesity and related pregnancy complications. Maternal weight pre and post-pregnancy affect mothers and children's health by significantly impacting the in utero environment on fetal development and the child's health throughout their lifespan[2]. Underweight women tend to have low birth weight babies as opposed to obese women who have larger gestation (macrosomia) babies[3]. A low-birth-weight infant is defined as less than 2,500g.  Macrosomia, defined as birth weight greater than 4,000g, increases the risk of complications at delivery such as caesarean birth, vacuum extraction, episiotomy, acute haemorrhage, immediate adverse health effects, gestational diabetes, pregnancy-induced hypertension and an increased risk of obesity in childhood.[4]

The US institute of medicine (IOM) published gestational weight gain recommendations for women based on pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) in the guidelines are as follows[1][4].

Body mass indexRecommended gestational weight gain
Underweight < 18.5kg/m 212.5 -18.5 kg
Normal-weight - 18.5 - 24.9kg/m 211.5 - 16 kg
Overweight – 25 - 29.9kg/m 27 - 11.5 kg
Obese > 30kg/m 25 – 9 kg

Women who exhibited recommended weight gain are at minor risk of complications throughout pregnancy and delivery[4]. Mothers with excess weight gain relative to IOM recommendations more often have neonates that score below the APGAR'5 scale and are more inclined to experience complications[1]. In previous studies, the risk of preterm birth, larger gestation babies (macrosomia), diabetes, preeclampsia, eclampsia and caesarean section increases with increased BMI[5][2].

Where is the research from?

This study was conducted by researches of the Institute of Dietetics, Department of Hygiene and Human Nutrition, Poznań University of Life Sciences; at the Gynaecology and Obstetrics Training Hospital, Poznań University of Medical Sciences. The study project was approved by the Independent Ethics Committee at the Karol Marcinkowski University of Medical Sciences, Poznań.

What kind of research was this?

This research was a quantitative assessment designed to assess the intervention of physical activity program of pregnant women throughout their second and third trimester, determining the effect on variables birth weight, appropriate maternal weight gain, the method of delivery and week of gestation. The data was measured through questionnaires and recorded with the ActiGraph GT3X monitor. The evidence provided can be considered a strong article as there isn’t much research comparing short and long term moderate physical activity in pregnant woman.

What did the research involve?

The method consisted of 57 pregnant women with uncomplicated single pregnancies participating in a 10 to 18-week physical activity program through their second and third trimesters. The woman were divided into two groups, short and long moderate physical activity, in comparison by their age, height, weight and body mass index pre and post-pregnancy. ActiGraph GT3X monitor monitored physical activity. Individual consultation with a dietitian was implemented every three weeks to obtain healthy nutrition throughout pregnancy. Data on delivery consisted of body weight, method of delivery, week of birth, gestation birth weight, baby length on study completion.

Exercise program

The physical activity program implemented was designed around the guidelines of the American Congress of obstetricians and gynaecologists. The program consisted of safe pregnancy activities of individualised pregnancy workouts, swimming, walking, cycling and yoga for 30 mins every day or most days of the week. In addition, applicants took part in a training session to assess their current health and fitness status and were advised on adjustments to their level of physical activity before commencement. Participant's physical activity was recorded with the ActiGraph GT3X monitor. In addition, the participants wore the devices on a flexible waistline belt due in daily activities.

Women were advised to not participate in physical activity if they experienced dizziness, headaches, chest pains, muscle weakness or oedema of the calves or any other abnormal signs.

The study's limitations were the small number of participants than anticipated inhibiting the association of physical activity and the pregnancy results of the investigation as well as participants lack of motivation to exercise can also limit findings. Furthermore, addressing the fetal physiological response to maternal physical activity such as heart rate changes would have been an interesting concept. Research has recognised that fetal heart rate increases by 10-30 beats per minute over the baseline of exercise exertion in minimum to moderate exercise[3].

What were the basic results?

Overall, the researchers concluded that there was a slight variance in weight gain. The women in the shorter duration of physical activity had six times greater excess weight gain than the normal range. The longer duration physical activity showed lower weight gain under the standard recommendation. The shorter duration physical activity group had twice as many cases of macrosomia and vacuum extraction occurring in the group. There were three cases of preterm births and three times as many low birth weight cases in the comparison group. No significance was found in terms of low birth weight or gestation at birth.

Unfortunately, due to the low participant rate, there wasn’t a possibility to show significance in the relationship between the duration of physical activity and macrosomia and obstetric outcomes. Therefore, further investigation is required.

What conclusions can we take from this research?

From the aspect of pregnant women, recent publications are increasing their focus on the impact of physical activity in pregnancy, whether beneficial or adverse to the pregnancy outcome[6]. The research, to a degree, enhances the benefits of increased duration of moderate physical activity as it improves physical fitness and prevents excessive weight gain. However, it reported the shorter intensity and duration of physical activity decreased due to the increased weight changes in the third trimester, resulting in less than 21 minutes of physical activity. The recommendation for exercise is 30 minutes per day. Unfortunately, most pregnant women don’t adhere to regular exercise; therefore, they don’t meet the US institute of medicine standard for the minimum amount of exercise to stay healthy per day[7]. The study also confirmed that physical activity positively affects obstetric outcomes as the number of vaginal births was comparable in both groups.

Further research on the influence of optimal type, frequency and intensity of physical activity programs and the affects on obstetric outcomes need further observation in larger population intervention.

Practical advice

Physical activity guidelines recommend at least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity activity spread out through the week. Women who regularly engaged in vigorous-intensity aerobic exercise or were physically active before conception can continue these activities under the guidance of a doctor, obstetrician - gynaecologist or obstetric care provider[8].  Women with or without a sedentary lifestyle should be encouraged to participate in physical activity. When starting a new exercise program during pregnancy, the Australian guidelines suggest beginning at a light to a moderate exercise program with constant consultation with various professionals to adjust the program accordingly[9]. Guidelines also stipulate if to cease exercise if a woman feels dizzy, abdominal pain, pain or oedema of the calf , vaginal bleeding/fluid, pelvic pain excessive fatigue[9].

Further information/resources

References

  • ↑ a b c d Mizgier M, Mruczyk K, Jarząbek-Bielecka G, Jeszka J. The impact of physical activity during pregnancy on maternal weight and obstetric outcomes. Ginekologia polska. 2018;89(2):80-8.
  • ↑ a b Leddy MA, Power ML, Schulkin J. The impact of maternal obesity on maternal and fetal health. Reviews in obstetrics and gynecology. 2008;1(4):170.
  • ↑ a b My AC, Connection C, Rounds AC. Physical activity and exercise during pregnancy and the postpartum period.
  • ↑ a b c 1.     Nomura K, Kido M, Tanabe A, Nagashima K, Takenoshita S, Ando K. Investigation of optimal weight gain during pregnancy for Japanese Women. Scientific reports. 2017 May 31;7(1):1-7
  • ↑ Olson D, Sikka RS, Hayman J, Novak M, Stavig C. Exercise in pregnancy. Current sports medicine reports. 2009 May 1;8(3):147-53
  • ↑ Hegaard HK, Pedersen BK, Bruun Nielsen B, Damm P. Leisure time physical activity during pregnancy and impact on gestational diabetes mellitus, pre-eclampsia, preterm delivery and birth weight: a review. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. 2007 Jan 1;86(11):1290-6.
  • ↑ Tung CT, Lee CF, Lin SS, Lin HM. The exercise patterns of pregnant women in Taiwan. Journal of Nursing Research. 2014 Dec 1;22(4):242-9.
  • ↑ Artal R, O'Toole M. Guidelines of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists for exercise during pregnancy and the postpartum period. British journal of sports medicine. 2003 Feb 1;37(1):6-12.
  • ↑ a b Evenson KR, Barakat R, Brown WJ, Dargent-Molina P, Haruna M, Mikkelsen EM, Mottola MF, Owe KM, Rousham EK, Yeo S. Guidelines for physical activity during pregnancy: comparisons from around the world. American journal of lifestyle medicine. 2014 Mar;8(2):102-21.

Where this page came from

This page was imported from Wikibooks. From “Exercise as it relates to Disease” on Wikibooks, by its contributors, under CC BY-SA 4.0. Changed here: set as a page; navigation and edit links left out; each image under its own licence, credited in its caption.

Nobody has written it yet — it is the source material at a new address, which is why search engines are asked to skip it and why no one earns from it. It is up for grabs: take it on, and it is yours to rewrite and to earn from.

Comments

Spinner Logo

Next in Exercise as it relates to Disease

CC BY-SA 4.0
This is a critique of a study assessing "Recreational Physical Activity During Pregnancy and Risk of Preeclampsia" conducted by Tanya K. Sorensen et al.[1] ## What is the background to this research? Preeclampsia is a hypertensive disorder resulting in an increase to the mother's blood pressure duri
CC BY-SA 4.0
This is a critical analysis of the journal article from Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise: "Effects of Aerobic Exercise during Pregnancy on One-Month Infant Neuromotor Skills" by McMillan AG, May LE, Gaines GG, Isler C, Kuehn D (2019). ## What is the background to this research? The purpos
CC BY-SA 4.0
The following article is a critique of the primary research of C. Robinson-Cohen et al. Physical Activity and Change in Estimated GFR among persons with CKD [1] and is designed to assist health care professionals in providing patient centred care considering recent research developments. This critic
CC BY-SA 4.0
This is a critique of the research article "Physical exercise impact on variables related to emotional and functional well-being in older adults"[1], completed by Belmonte Darraz S[2], González-Roldán AM[3], de María Arrebola J[4] and Montoro-Aguilar CI[5], and published in Revista Espanola de Geria
CC BY-SA 4.0
This page is a critique of the journal article: Naderi, A et al (2021) 'Six-month table tennis training improves body composition, bone health and physical performance in untrained older men; a randomized controlled trial'. Science & Sports. 36(1) pp 72.e1-72.e9.[1] ## What is the background to this