Skip to content
Hub Nexus

No author yetClaim it

Version 1Updated 1 min read

Support

Representations, whether of vectors or of maps, vary with the bases.
For instance, with respect to the two bases {ℰ}_{2} and

B = ⟨ ( \begin{matrix}1 \\ 1\end{matrix} ) , ( \begin{matrix}1 \\ − 1\end{matrix} ) ⟩

for {ℝ}^{2}, the vector
{\overset{→}{e}}_{1} has two different representations.

{R e p}_{{ℰ}_{2}} ( {\overset{→}{e}}_{1} ) = ( \begin{matrix}1 \\ 0\end{matrix} ) \ {R e p}_{B} ( {\overset{→}{e}}_{1} ) = ( \begin{matrix}1 / 2 \\ 1 / 2\end{matrix} )

Similarly, with respect to {ℰ}_{2} , {ℰ}_{2} and {ℰ}_{2} , B, the identity map
has two different representations.

{R e p}_{{ℰ}_{2} , {ℰ}_{2}} ( \text{id} ) = ( \begin{matrix}1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1\end{matrix} ) \ {R e p}_{{ℰ}_{2} , B} ( \text{id} ) = ( \begin{matrix}1 / 2 & 1 / 2 \\ 1 / 2 & − 1 / 2\end{matrix} )

With our point of view that the objects of our studies are vectors and
maps, in fixing bases
we are adopting a scheme of tags or names for these objects, that are
convienent for computation.
We will now see how to translate among these names— we will
see exactly how representations vary as the bases vary.

Where this page came from

This page was imported from Wikibooks. From “Linear Algebra” on Wikibooks, by its contributors, under CC BY-SA 4.0. Changed here: set as a page; navigation and edit links left out; each image under its own licence, credited in its caption.

Nobody has written it yet — it is the source material at a new address, which is why search engines are asked to skip it and why no one earns from it. It is up for grabs: take it on, and it is yours to rewrite and to earn from.

Comments

Spinner Logo

Next in Linear Algebra

CC BY-SA 4.0
In converting ${R e p}_{B} ( \overset{→}{v} )$ to ${R e p}_{D} ( \overset{→}{v} )$ the underlying vector $\overset{→}{v}$ doesn't change. Thus, this translation is accomplished by the identity map on the space, described so that the domain space vectors are represented with respect to B and the codo
CC BY-SA 4.0
The first subsection shows how to convert the representation of a vector with respect to one basis to the representation of that same vector with respect to another basis. Here we will see how to convert the representation of a map with respect to one pair of bases to the representation of that map
CC BY-SA 4.0
We first consider orthogonal projection onto a line. To orthogonally project a vector $\overset{→}{v}$ onto a line $ℓ$, mark the point on the line at which someone standing on that point could see $\overset{→}{v}$ by looking straight up or down (from that person's point of view). The picture shows s
CC BY-SA 4.0
This subsection is optional. It requires material from the prior, also optional, subsection. The work done here will only be needed in the final two sections of Chapter Five. The prior subsection suggests that projecting onto the line spanned by $\overset{→}{s}$ decomposes a vector $\overset{→}{v}$
CC BY-SA 4.0
This subsection, like the others in this section, is optional. It also requires material from the optional earlier subsection on Combining Subspaces. The prior subsections project a vector onto a line by decomposing it into two parts: the part in the line ${\text{proj}}_{[ \overset{→}{s} \ ]} ( \ove
CC BY-SA 4.0
Scientists are often presented with a system that has no solution and they must find an answer anyway. That is, they must find a value that is as close as possible to being an answer. For instance, suppose that we have a coin to use in flipping. This coin has some proportion m of heads to total flip