Skip to content
Hub Nexus

No author yetClaim it

Version 1Updated 5 min read

Support

Everyone has noticed that table salt comes in little cubes.

Remarkably, the explanation for the cubical external shape is the simplest
one possible: the internal shape, the way the atoms lie, is also cubical.
The internal structure is pictured below.
Salt is sodium chloride, and the
small spheres shown are sodium while the big ones are chloride.
(To simplify the view, only the sodiums and chlorides on the front, top,
and right are shown.)

The specks of salt that we see when we spread a little out on the
table consist of many repetitions of this fundamental unit.
That is, these cubes of atoms stack up to make the
larger cubical structure that we see.
A solid, such as table salt,
with a regular internal structure is a crystal.

We can restrict our attention to the front face.
There,
we have this pattern repeated many times.

The distance between the corners of this cell is about 3.34 Ångstroms
(an Ångstrom is {}1 {0}^{− 10} meters).
Obviously that unit is unwieldly for describing points in the crystal lattice.
Instead, the thing to do is to
take as a unit the length of each side of the square.
That is, we naturally adopt this basis.

⟨ ( \begin{matrix}3.34 \\ 0\end{matrix} ) , ( \begin{matrix}0 \\ 3.34\end{matrix} ) ⟩

Then we can describe, say, the corner in the upper right of the picture above
as {}3 {\overset{→}{β}}_{1} + 2 {\overset{→}{β}}_{2}.

Another crystal from everyday experience is pencil lead.
It is graphite,
formed from carbon atoms arranged in this shape.

This is a single plane of graphite.
A piece of graphite consists of many of these planes layered in a stack.
(The chemical bonds between the planes are
much weaker than the bonds inside the planes, which explains why
graphite writes---it can be sheared so that the planes slide
off and are left on the paper.)
A convenient unit of length can be made by
decomposing the hexagonal ring into three regions that are rotations
of this unit cell.

A natural basis then would consist of the vectors that form the sides of
that unit cell.
The distance along the bottom and slant is 1.42 ngstroms,
so this

⟨ ( \begin{matrix}1.42 \\ 0\end{matrix} ) , ( \begin{matrix}1.23 \\ .71\end{matrix} ) ⟩

is a good basis.

The selection of convienent bases extends to three dimensions.
Another familiar crystal formed from carbon is diamond.
Like table salt, it is built from cubes, but the structure inside each
cube is more complicated than salt's.
In addition to carbons at each corner,

there are carbons in the middle of each face.

(To show the added face carbons clearly,
the corner carbons have been reduced to dots.)
There are also four more carbons inside the cube,
two that are a quarter of the way up from the
bottom and two that are a quarter of the way down from the top.

(As before, carbons shown earlier have been reduced here to dots.)
The distance along any edge of the cube is 2.18 Ångstroms.
Thus, a natural basis for describing the locations of the carbons,
and the bonds between them, is this.

⟨ ( \begin{matrix}2.18 \\ 0 \\ 0\end{matrix} ) , ( \begin{matrix}0 \\ 2.18 \\ 0\end{matrix} ) , ( \begin{matrix}0 \\ 0 \\ 2.18\end{matrix} ) ⟩

Even the few examples given here show that
the structures of crystals is complicated enough that
some organized system to give the locations of the atoms, and how they
are chemically bound, is needed.
One tool for that organization is a convienent basis.
This application of bases is simple, but it shows a context where
the idea arises naturally.
The work in this chapter just takes this simple idea and develops it.

Exercises

Problem 1

How many fundamental regions are there in one face of a speck of salt?
(With a ruler, we can estimate that face is a square that is 0.1 cm on a side.)

Problem 2

In the graphite picture, imagine that we are interested in a point 5.67 Ångstroms up and 3.14 Ångstroms over from the origin.

  • Express that point in terms of the basis given for graphite.
  • How many hexagonal shapes away is this point from the origin?
  • Express that point in terms of a second basis, where the first basis vector is the same, but the second is perpendicular to the first (going up the plane) and of the same length.

Problem 3

Give the locations of the atoms in the diamond cube both in terms of the basis, and in Ångstroms.

Problem 4

This illustrates how the dimensions of a unit cell could be computed from the shape in which a substance crystalizes (see Ebbing 1993, p. 462).

  • Recall that there are {}6.022 × 1 {0}^{23} atoms in a mole (this is Avagadro's number). From that, and the fact that platinum has a mass of 195.08 grams per mole, calculate the mass of each atom.
  • Platinum crystalizes in a face-centered cubic lattice with atoms at each lattice point, that is, it looks like the middle picture given above for the diamond crystal. Find the number of platinums per unit cell (hint: sum the fractions of platinums that are inside of a single cell).
  • From that, find the mass of a unit cell.
  • Platinum crystal has a density of 21.45 grams per cubic centimeter. From this, and the mass of a unit cell, calculate the volume of a unit cell.
  • Find the length of each edge.
  • Describe a natural three-dimensional basis.

Solutions

References

  • Ebbing, Darrell D. (1993), General Chemistry (Fourth ed.), Houghton Mifflin.

Where this page came from

This page was imported from Wikibooks. From “Linear Algebra” on Wikibooks, by its contributors, under CC BY-SA 4.0. Changed here: set as a page; navigation and edit links left out; each image under its own licence, credited in its caption.

Nobody has written it yet — it is the source material at a new address, which is why search engines are asked to skip it and why no one earns from it. It is up for grabs: take it on, and it is yours to rewrite and to earn from.

Comments

Spinner Logo

Next in Linear Algebra

CC BY-SA 4.0
Imagine that a Political Science class studying the American presidential process holds a mock election. Members of the class are asked to rank, from most preferred to least preferred, the nominees from the Democratic Party, the Republican Party, and the Third Party, and this is the result ($>$ mean
CC BY-SA 4.0
"You can't add apples and oranges," the old saying goes. It reflects our experience that in applications the quantities have units and keeping track of those units is worthwhile. Everyone has done calculations such as this one that use the units as a check. ${}60 \ \frac{\text{sec}}{\text{min}} ⋅ 60
CC BY-SA 4.0
In the examples following the definition of a vector space we developed the intuition that some spaces are "the same" as others. For instance, the space of two-tall column vectors and the space of two-wide row vectors are not equal because their elements—column vectors and row vectors—are not equal,
CC BY-SA 4.0
We start with two examples that suggest the right definition. Example 1.1 Consider the example mentioned above, the space of two-wide row vectors and the space of two-tall column vectors. They are "the same" in that if we associate the vectors that have the same components, e.g., $( \begin{matrix}1
CC BY-SA 4.0
In the prior subsection, after stating the definition of an isomorphism, we gave some results supporting the intuition that such a map describes spaces as "the same". Here we will formalize this intuition. While two spaces that are isomorphic are not equal, we think of them as almost equal— as equiv
CC BY-SA 4.0
Definition 1.1 A function between vector spaces $h : V → W$ that preserves the operations of addition if ${\overset{→}{v}}_{1} , {\overset{→}{v}}_{2} ∈ V$ then $h ( {\overset{→}{v}}_{1} + {\overset{→}{v}}_{2} ) = h ( {\overset{→}{v}}_{1} ) + h ( {\overset{→}{v}}_{2} )$ and scalar multiplication if $