Skip to content
Hub Nexus

No author yetClaim it

Version 1Updated 5 min read

Support

Four vectors

A four vector represents a displacement in spacetime.

(Image: The original uploader was RobinH at English Wikibooks ., CC BY-SA 3.0)

If the spacetime has a metric given by:

d {s}^{2} = d {t}^{2} โˆ’ d {x}^{2} โˆ’ d {y}^{2} โˆ’ d {z}^{2}

and if the space-time is flat the magnitude of the four vector is calculated from:

{๐’}^{2} = {A}^{2} โˆ’ {B}^{2} โˆ’ {C}^{2} โˆ’ {D}^{2}

Where A, B, C, D are the projections of the vector on the corresponding coordinate axes (t,x,y,z). The magnitude of a four vector is given by:

S = | {๐’}^{2} {|}^{1 / 2} = \sqrt{{A}^{2} โˆ’ {B}^{2} โˆ’ {C}^{2} โˆ’ {D}^{2}}

The scalar product of a four vector (also known as the "dot product" or "inner product") can be derived in the same way as the scalar product for an ordinary vector (a three vector, see scalar product). So the scalar product of two four vectors, ๐€ . ๐ is:

๐€ . ๐ = {A}_{t} {B}_{t} โˆ’ {A}_{x} {B}_{x} โˆ’ {A}_{y} {B}_{y} โˆ’ {A}_{z} {B}_{z}

This can also be derived easily from the metric tensor of Minkowski spacetime. The scalar product of two four-vectors x and y is defined (using indicial notation) as:

x โ‹… y = {x}^{a} {ฮท}_{a b} {y}^{b} = ( \begin{matrix}{x}^{0} & {x}^{1} & {x}^{2} & {x}^{3}\end{matrix} ) ( \begin{matrix}โˆ’ 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1\end{matrix} ) ( \begin{matrix}{y}^{0} \\ {y}^{1} \\ {y}^{2} \\ {y}^{3}\end{matrix} ) = โˆ’ {x}^{0} {y}^{0} + {x}^{1} {y}^{1} + {x}^{2} {y}^{2} + {x}^{3} {y}^{3}

The scalar product of four vectors is independent of the coordinate system:

\begin{matrix}A {'}_{x} & = & ฮณ ( {A}_{x} โˆ’ \frac{v}{c} {A}_{t} ) \\ A {'}_{y} & = & {A}_{y} \\ A {'}_{z} & = & {A}_{z} \\ A {'}_{t} & = & ฮณ ( โˆ’ \frac{v}{c} {A}_{x} + {A}_{t} )\end{matrix}

The scalar product in this frame is:

{{A}^{โ€ฒ}}_{_} โ‹… {{B}^{โ€ฒ}}_{_} = A {'}_{x} B {'}_{x} + A {'}_{y} B {'}_{y} + A {'}_{z} B {'}_{z} โˆ’ A {'}_{t} B {'}_{t}

Simplifying, we get:

\begin{matrix}{{A}^{โ€ฒ}}_{_} โ‹… {{B}^{โ€ฒ}}_{_} & = & {ฮณ}^{2} ( {A}_{x} {B}_{x} โˆ’ \frac{v}{c} ( {A}_{x} {B}_{t} + {A}_{t} {B}_{x} ) + \frac{{v}^{2}}{{c}^{2}} {A}_{t} {B}_{t} ) \\ & & + {A}_{y} {B}_{y} + {A}_{z} {B}_{z} & \\ & & โˆ’ {ฮณ}^{2} ( \frac{{v}^{2}}{{c}^{2}} {A}_{x} {B}_{x} โˆ’ \frac{v}{c} ( {A}_{x} {B}_{t} + {A}_{t} {B}_{x} ) + {A}_{t} {B}_{t} ) \\ & = & {( 1 โˆ’ \frac{{v}^{2}}{{c}^{2}} )}^{โˆ’ 1} ( {A}_{x} {B}_{x} + \frac{{v}^{2}}{{c}^{2}} {A}_{t} {B}_{t} ) \\ & & + {A}_{y} {B}_{y} + {A}_{z} {B}_{z} \\ & & โˆ’ {( 1 โˆ’ \frac{{v}^{2}}{{c}^{2}} )}^{โˆ’ 1} ( \frac{{v}^{2}}{{c}^{2}} {A}_{x} {B}_{x} โˆ’ {A}_{t} {B}_{t} ) \\ & = & {A}_{x} {B}_{x} + {A}_{y} {B}_{y} + {A}_{z} {B}_{z} โˆ’ {A}_{t} {B}_{t}\end{matrix}

Which is the same as the scalar product in the original frame of reference.

Properties:

  1. Distributivity for vector addition ๐€ . ( ๐ + ๐‚ )
  2. Symmetry ๐€ . ๐ = ๐ . ๐€
  3. Leibniz rule of differentiation applies ie: d ( ๐€ . ๐ ) = d ๐€ . ๐ + ๐€ . d ๐
  4. Orthogonality ๐€ . ๐ = 0 if ๐€ is perpendicular to ๐
  5. ๐€ . ๐€ = {๐€}^{2}

We now know that the dot product of two four-vectors is a scalar result, i. e., its value is independent of coordinate system. This can be used to advantage on occasion.

In the odd geometry of spacetime it is not obvious what perpendicular means. We therefore define two four-vectors {A}_{_} and {B}_{_} to be perpendicular if their dot product is zero, in the same way as with three-vectors.

{A}_{_} โ‹… {B}_{_} = 0

Because the dot product is a scalar, if vectors are perpendicular in one frame, they will be perpendicular in all frames.

We can also consider the dot product of a four-vector {A}_{_} which resolves into ( {A}_{x} , {A}_{t} ) in the unprimed frame. Let us further suppose that the spacelike component is zero in some primed frame, so that the components in this frame are (0, At' ) The fact that the dot product is independent of coordinate system means that

{A}_{_} โ‹… {A}_{_} = {A}_{x}^{2} โˆ’ {A}_{t}^{2} = โˆ’ {A}_{t} {'}^{2}

This constitutes an extension of the spacetime Pythagorean theorem to four-vectors other then the position four-vector. Thus, for instance, the wavenumber for some wave may be zero in the primed frame, which means that the wavenumber and frequency in the unprimed frame are related to the frequency in the primed frame by {k}^{2} โˆ’ {ฯ‰}^{2} / {c}^{2} = โˆ’ ฯ‰ {'}^{2} / {c}^{2}.

We indicate a four-vector by underlining and write the components in the following way: {k}_{_} = ( k , ฯ‰ / c ), where {k}_{_} is the wave four-vector, k is its spacelike component, and ฯ‰ / c is its timelike component. For three space dimensions, where we have a wave vector rather than just a wavenumber, we write {k}_{_} = ( k , ฯ‰ / c ).

Another example of a four-vector is simply the position vector in spacetime, {x}_{_} = ( x , c t ), or {x}_{_} = ( ๐ฑ , c t ) in three space dimensions. The c multiplies the timelike component in this case, because that is what is needed to give it the same dimensions as the spacelike component.

Proper time

Classically, the temporal derivative, d/dt acts like a scalar so we can multiply a vector by it, and get another vector.

In relativity t is part of a four-vector, which means d/dt also is, so we can't simply differentiate vectors with respect to t and expect to get vectors.

For example, the position of a stationary particle is (0, ct).

Viewed from a frame moving at v to the right, its position becomes (-vฯ„, cฯ„), where ฯ„=ฮณt is the time as measured in the moving frame.

If we differentiate with respect to ฯ„ the velocity would be (-v, c)

If we differentiate with respect to t, we get (0, c) in the stationary frame, which would be (using the Lorentz transform) (-ฮณv, -ฮณc) in the moving frame, if this were a four vector.

These two expressions differ by a factor of ฮณ, when measured in the same frame, so this can not be a four vector.

However, if the moving observer divides by ฮณ, which is the time dilation, they will get the same vector as the stationary observer.

Doing this is equivalent to differentiating by the time in the particles own rest frame. Since this works for the position vector, we can expect it to work for all vectors.

The time measured in a particle's rest frame is called its proper time.

Differentiating a vector with respect to proper time gives another vector, which is the relativistic equivalent of the temporal derivative.

Where this page came from

This page was imported from Wikibooks. From โ€œSpecial Relativityโ€ on Wikibooks, by its contributors, under CC BY-SA 4.0. Changed here: set as a page; navigation and edit links left out; each image under its own licence, credited in its caption.

Nobody has written it yet โ€” it is the source material at a new address, which is why search engines are asked to skip it and why no one earns from it. It is up for grabs: take it on, and it is yours to rewrite and to earn from.

Comments

Spinner Logo

Next in Special Relativity

CC BY-SA 4.0
From here to the sun? - What is one nanosecond in meters? One second? One day?
CC BY-SA 4.0
Light would travel to our eyes as waves through the aether like sound travels to our ears as waves in the air. The nature of the aether was unknown but a possible link between the aether and electrical and magnetic fields became apparent during the first half of the nineteenth century. Faraday demon
CC BY-SA 4.0
We think that the simple length of a thing is "invariant". However, as is shown in the illustrations below, what we are actually suggesting is that length seems to be invariant in a three-dimensional coordinate system. ![Coord1b]( (Image: The original uploader was RobinH at English Wikibooks ., CC B
CC BY-SA 4.0
The Lorentz transformation for time compares the readings of synchronised clocks at any instant. It compares the actual readings on clocks allowing for any time delay due to transmitting information between observers and answers the question "what does the other observer's clock actually read now, a
CC BY-SA 4.0
will become redefined and relativity will lead to an entirely new physics. The new physics has an effect at the ordinary level of experience through the relation $K = ฮณ m {c}^{2} โˆ’ m {c}^{2} \$ whereby it is the tiny deviations in gamma from unity that are expressed as everyday kinetic energy so tha